SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 340

ARUN KUMAR SHARMA
Usha – Appellant
Versus
Sarubai – Respondent


Advocates:
Jaideep Sirpurkar for appellants; Sushil Kumar Tiwari for respondents No. 1 to 7

ORDER

1. The appellants / defendants having lost in both the courts below have filed the instant appeal.

2. The instant Second Appeal under section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been preferred by the appellants / defendants being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 25.2.2013 passed by First Additional District Judge, Chhindwara (MP) in Civil Appeal No.30-A/12, whereby learned First Appellate Court has affirmed the judgment and decree dated 7.8.2009 passed by First Civil Judge Class-I, Chhindwara (MP) in Civil Suit No.21-A/08.

3. The facts of the case, succinctly stated are that the respondents No. 1 to 7 / plaintiffs filed a suit for declaration of the land bearing khasra No.570/7 area 0.085 hectare situated in Mouja Chhindwara, district Chhindwara to be undivided joint Hindu Family property and also for partition of 1/7th share in the land in dispute in favour of the respondents No. 1 to 7 / plaintiff separately because no partition has taken place. Claim in the suit was based on the allegation that the suit property was jointly owned by one Pandhari, Eknath and Sarubai and was not partitioned. Thereafter, the suit property devolved upon the respondents No. 1 to 7, ho

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top