SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 356

MILIND RAMESH PHADKE
Jaffrudin – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Sourav Singh Tomar for petitioner; Gopal Chaurasiya, Dy. Government Advocate for respondents/State.

ORDER

1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of petitioner being aggrieved by the order dated 25.6.2013 passed by Commissioner, Chambal Division, whereby the appeal against the order dated 18.12.2012 passed by the Collector, Sheopur, was dismissed. Further the petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 18.12.2012 passed by the Collector, Sheopur whereby the arms license No.120/DM/Sheopur, issued in favour of the petitioner was cancelled on the ground that he is a dreaded criminal and is involved in various criminal cases.

2. The facts as stated reveals that in the year 2002, the petitioner applied for grant of license and after considering the documents submitted and after conducting a detailed scrutiny license No.120/DM/Sheopur was issued to the petitioner. Thereafter, in the year 2004, on a recommendation by respondent No.4/Superintendent of Police that a criminal case No.50/2003 had been registered against the petitioner, respondent No. 3, the Collector cancelled the arms license. An appeal was preferred against the said cancellation by the petitioner before the Commissioner, Chambal Division, and vide order dated 11.3.2005 the matter w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top