SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 692

G. S. AHLUWALIA
Jagdish Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : S.K. Tiwari, Raj Shrivastava.
For the Respondent: Padamshri Agrawal.

JUDGMENT :

G.S. AHLUWALIA, J.

1. This Criminal Appeal under Section 374 of Cr.P.C. has been filed against the judgment and sentence dated 16/5/2017 passed by Special Additional Sessions Judge, Chachauda, District Guna in Special Sessions Trial No. 73/2014, by which the appellants have been convicted and sentenced as under:

Appellant No. 1 Jagdish Singh:

Section

Act

Imprisonment

Detail of fine/if deposited

Imprisonment in lieu of fine

363/34

IPC

03 Years RI

1000/-

1 Year RI

366/34

IPC

05 Years RI

1000/-

1 Year RI

376(1)(N)

IPC

10 Years RI

2000/-

02 Years RI

6 r/w 5(L)

POCSO Act

10 Years RI

2000/-

02 Years RI

Appellant No. 2 Bhanwarlal:

363/34

IPC

3 Years RI

1000/-

1 Year RI

366/34

IPC

5 Years RI

1000/-

1 Year RI

2. The necessary facts for disposal of the present appeal in short are that on 14/5/2014, the complainant lodged a Guminsaan report that his daughter aged about 17 years had left the house on the pretext of going to forest, but has not returned back and accordingly, the Guminsaan r

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top