SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 188

ANIL VERMA
Santosh Meghwal – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Priyvrat Singh Chouhan for applicant; Kapil Mahant, Panel Lawyer, for respondent No.1/State.

ORDER

1. The applicant has preferred this revision under section 397 of Cr.P.C. being aggrieved by the order dated 31.3.2023 passed by the learned Additional Session Judge, Susner, District Agar Malwa (M.P.) in Sessions Trial No.12/2022, whereby an application preferred under section 311 of Cr.P.C. by the applicant / accused for re cross-examination of the prosecution witness (PW-1) has been dismissed.

2. The facts giving rise to the present revision are that on 10.8.2022 prosecutrix along with her father Shankarlal and her aunt (Bua) launched an FIR at Police Station Nalkheda, Agar Malwa by stating that her date of birth is 4.7.2005. The father of the prosecutrix and wife of the applicant/accused namely Vishnu Bai have Rakhi relations for last ten years. Vishnu Bai and her husband / present applicant often used to visited the house of the prosecutrix and they used to talk on mobile phone. On 8.8.2022 at about 4:00 PM while the prosecutrix was going towards the market, near Veterinary Hospital she met the applicant / accused, where applicant with a wrong intention caught hold her left hand and started harassing her. Upon this, the prosecutrix started screaming for help, then the acc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top