VIVEK RUSIA, SHAILENDRA SHUKLA
GHANSHYAM s/o KARULAL DHAKAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT VIVEK RUSIA, J. – All appeals arise out of the homicidal death of Bharat (deceased No. 1), Shantilal (deceased No. 3) and Shobharam, whose dead bodies were found in the agriculture field of Nathu Gayri, near Maleni River. Since these appeals arise out of three murders committed sequentially on different dates by the common accused, therefore, all three criminal appeals were tagged and heard together and are being decided by a common judgment.
2. Appellants Ghanshyam, Bindu @ Pushkar and Mukesh have filed CRA No. 362/2007 being aggrieved by the judgment dated 29th November, 2006 arising out of ST No. 94/2005 whereby they have been convicted and sentenced for homicidal death of late Shantilal (deceased No. 3) as under : –
|
| Section/Act | Imprisonment | Fine amount | Imprisonment in lieu of default of payment of the fine |
| Ghanshyam s/o Karulal | S. 364 I.P.C. | Imprisonment for Life | Rs 1000/- | 6 months Rigorous imprisonment |
|
| S. 302 r/w 34 I.P.C. | Imprisonment for Life | Rs 1000/- | 6 months Rigorous imprisonment |
|
| S. 201 I.P.C | 3 years Rigorous | ||
Thimma and Thimma Raju vs. State of Mysore
Suresh and anr. vs. State of Haryana
Shivaji Chintappa Patil vs. State of Maharashtra
Pavan Vasudeo Sharma vs. State of Maharashtra
Anwar Ali and another vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
State of Karnataka vs. A. B. Mahesha and ors.
Digamber Vaishanav and ors. vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Sukhram vs. State of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.