High Court of Madhya Pradesh
G.S.Ahluwalia, J.
SIKANDAR SINGH NARVARIYA alias LALU – APPELLANT
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR. – RESPONDENTS
Cri. Appeal No. 5870 of 2021
Decided On : 04-10-2021
CRIMINAL APPEAL - [SECTION 439(2)] - [BAIL] - [SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) ACT, 1989] - [SECTION 3(2)(VI), 3(2)(V)] - [INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860] - [SECTION 302, 465, 467, 471, 166, 166-A, 193, 196, 197, 199, 203, 218, 201] - [CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, 1973] - [SECTION 15-A] - The Court, while dismissing the appeal filed by the appellant for grant of bail, observed that the appellant, along with co-accused Gajendra and Daplu, had not only assaulted the deceased but also got him admitted to the hospital under a fake name. The Court noted that the appellant had received the dead body of the deceased and cremated it somewhere in Gwalior without bringing it to the village. The Court also issued a show-cause notice to Gajendra Singh, co-accused, as to why the bail granted to him should not be recalled.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant, along with co-accused Gajendra and Daplu, was arrested for assaulting the deceased and getting him admitted to the hospital under a fake name. The appellant received the dead body of the deceased and cremated it somewhere in Gwalior without bringing it to the village. The appellant filed an appeal for grant of bail, which was dismissed by the Court.
Finding of the Court:
The Court held that the appellant, along with co-accused Gajendra and Daplu, had not only assaulted the deceased but also got him admitted to the hospital under a fake name. The Court noted that the appellant had received the dead body of the deceased and cremated it somewhere in Gwalior without bringing it to the village. The Court also issued a show-cause notice to Gajendra Singh, co-accused, as to why the bail granted to him should not be recalled.
Issues: Whether the appellant should be granted bail.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the appellant, along with co-accused Gajendra and Daplu, had not only assaulted the deceased but also got him admitted to the hospital under a fake name. The Court noted that the appellant had received the dead body of the deceased and cremated it somewhere in Gwalior without bringing it to the village. The Court also issued a show-cause notice to Gajendra Singh, co-accused, as to why the bail granted to him should not be recalled.
Final Decision: The Court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant for grant of bail.
ORDER/JUDGMENT : – Shri Pradeep Katare, Advocate for appellant.
Shri C. P. Singh, Panel Lawyer for the State.
None for the complainant.
It is submitted by the counsel for the State that the complainant has been informed about the pendency of this appeal as required under section 15-A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
2. Case Diary is available.
3. This first Criminal Appeal for grant of bail has been filed under section 14A(2) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities), Act, 1989 against the order dated 31-5-2021 passed by Second Additional Sessions Judge, Bhind/Special Judge, Bhind by which the application filed by the appellant for grant of bail has been rejected.
4. The appellant has been arrested on 19-2-2021 in connection with Crime No. 21/2021 registered at Police Station Barohi, District Bhind for offence punishable under sections 302, 465, 467, 471, 166, 166-A, 193, 196, 197, 199, 203, 218, 201 of Indian Penal Code and under sections 3(2)(vi), 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities), Act.
5. It is submitted by the counsel for the appellant that the Sessions Judge, Bhind by its order dated 10-8-2021 passed in BA No. 978/2021 has granted bail to the co-accused Gajendra Singh, whose case is identical to that of the present appellant. It is further submitted that according to the prosecution case, the appellant and other co-accused persons, namely, Daplu alias Omkar and Gajendra had assaulted the deceased-Shyamlal by means of Lathi and thereafter they took him to JA Hospital, Gwalior, where they got the deceased-Shyamlal admitted in the name of Nathuram and ultimately Shyamlal succumbed to the injuries. Death certificate in the name of Nathuram was also prepared, however, at a later stage it was found that in fact Nathuram had already expired on 15-6-2013 and the appellant and other co-accused, namely, Daplu alias Omkar and Gajendra Singh Narwariya had got the injured admitted in the hospital in the fake name. The case of the present appellant is identical to that of the co-accused Gajendra. The appellant is in jail from 19-2-2021. The trial is likely to take sufficiently long time and there is no possibility of his absconding or tampering with the prosecution case.
6. Per contra, it is submitted by counsel for State that there are serious allegations of assaulting the deceased Shyamlal by Lathi and above all the appellant as well as co-accused Omkar and Gajendra Singh took the deceased Shyamlal to the hospital and got him admitted in the fake name of Nathuram and also succeeded in getting the death certificate in the name of Nathuram, whereas Nathuram had already expired on 15-6-2013.
7. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for parties.
8. According to prosecution case, the complainant Upendra Singh Jatav made a complaint to the police that his neighbor Shyamlal was beaten by the appellant, Daplu s/o Nathu Singh Narwariya, Gajendra Singh Narwariya, about 6-7 days back and thereafter they took the injured to Gwalior and from thereafter the whereabouts of Shyamlal are not known. On this information, an enquiry was initiated and the statement of witnesses in the Merg enquiry were recorded. The Police found that in fact the deceased Shyamlal was beaten by appellant, co-accused Daplu @ Omkar and Gajendra by Lathi and thereafter they took the deceased to Gwalior and got him admitted in the J.A. Hospital Gwalior in the fake name of Nathuram s/o Hukum Singh. The injured Shyamlal who was admitted in the hospital by co-accused Omkar Singh in the name of Nathuram s/o Hukum expired on 8-6-2020. Accordingly, the dead body of Shyamlal was handed over to Omkar Singh after the postmortem. It appears that the dead body of Shyamlal, who was admitted in the fake name of Nathuram, was not brought in the village and his cremation was done somewhere else and since whereabouts of Shyamlal was not known, therefore, his neighb
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for a judicious exercise of discretion in granting bail, considering factors such as the nature of the offense, severity of punishment, an....
Bail – Parity is not the sole ground on which bail can be granted – Court, while granting bail, has to consider a number of aspects – While utilizing parity as a ground for bail, same must focus on r....
(1) Bail – For grant or denial of bail, nature of crime has huge relevancy – Importance of assigning reasoning for grant or denial of bail can never be undermined.(2) Cancellation of bail – Bail once....
(1) Judicial discretion in granting or refusing bail, as in case of any other discretion which is vested in a court as a judicial institution, is not unstructured.(2) Parity while granting bail must ....
The main legal point established is that the discretion to grant bail should be exercised judiciously, considering the seriousness of the offence and the need for proper reasoning in bail orders.
The decision emphasized the importance of considering the nature of the offence, severity of the punishment, and the likelihood of the accused interfering with the process of justice when deciding on....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.