SANJAY KUMAR SINGH
Ram Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
ORDER :
| Index |
| Contents |
| Facts of the case |
| Submissions on behalf of accused-applicant |
| Submissions on behalf of State and informant |
| Settled principles for considering bail prayer |
| Factual analysis of case |
| Discussion about issue of parity |
| Analysis about Article 14 of the Constitution |
| Conclusion |
| Result |
1. Heard Shri Upendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Rabindra Kumar Singh, learned Additional Government Advocate and Mr. Shamsher Singh, learned counsel, who is appearing on behalf of Mr. Shekhar Gangal, learned counsel for the first informant.
2. By means of this application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., applicant-Ram Singh, who is involved in Case Crime No. 332 of 2021, under Sections 147, 148, 323, 452, 504, 506, 304, 354(Ka) IPC and Sections 7/8 POCSO Act, Police Station Harduaganj, District Aligarh, seeks enlargement on bail during the pendency of trial.
Facts of the case
3. As per prosecution case, in brief, informant who is brother-in-law (Jeeja)of the victim, lodged a first information report on 30.08.2021 against G
Anil Kumar Yadav Vs. State (NCT of Delhi)
Brijmani Devi Vs. Pappu Kumar (2022) 4 SCC 497
Chaman Lal Vs. State of U.P. (2004)7 SCC 525
Dataram vs. State of U.P. and another
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar Vs. Rajesh Ranjan alias Pappu Yadav and another (2004)7 SCC 528
Mahipal Vs. Rajesh Kumar alias Polia and another
Naresh Vs. State of Maharashtra
Prashant Kumar Sarkar Vs. Ashis Chatterjee and another
Prahlad Singh Bhati Vs. NCT of Delhi and Others (2001) 4 SCC 280
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.