ORDER/JUDGMENT : – Shri R. S. Bansal, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri G. K. Agrawal, learned Government Advocate for the respondent-State on advance notice.

2. Petitioner has approached this Court, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, claiming to have filed a complaint (Annexure P-1) on 25-10-2021 before Police Station Maharajpura, Gwalior alleging fraud in the matter of loan transaction. It is the grievance of the petitioner that despite filing of such complaint, no action whatsoever is being taken thereupon.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner while relying upon the decision of this Court in the case of Rajendra Singh Pawar and others vs. State of M.P. and others, reported in 2021(1) M.P.L.J. (Cri.) 343, submits that respondents/Police Authorities may be directed to register a criminal case against the miscreants on application/complaint filed by the petitioner (Annexure P/1), take action against the accused persons, and after carrying out fair and impartial investigation into the matter, file charge sheet before the competent Court having criminal jurisdiction

4. Per contra, learned Government Advocate contends that the relief sought for cannot be countenan