SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 649

ATUL SREEDHARAN
YOGENDRA SINGH BAGHEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


ORDER : – The present petition under section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner herein and the allegation against him is one of abetment to commit suicide by the deceased. Looking at the nature of the case, the name of the deceased is not being referred to by name in this order.

2. The deceased is a married lady, aged about 44 years. She was a tenant in the house of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that but for the suicide note left behind by the deceased, there is no other evidence in this case implicating the petitioner herein.

3. Learned counsels for the State and the objector have opposed the petition for quashing of criminal proceedings against the petitioner on the ground that there is a strong prima facie case against the petitioner and that the suicide note by itself is self-explanatory laying down the role of the petitioner and how he was the cause for the deceased committing suicide. The suicide note is brief. In the said suicide note she has asked to forgive her from her husband for being in an illicit relation with the petitioner. She further says that because of her mistake, she is committing suicide and that there was no point

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top