Back
ANAND PATHAK
AYUSHA BHATNAGAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent
ORDER/JUDGMENT : – Shri Ashish Jadon, learned counsel for petitioner.
Shri G. K. Agrawal, learned Government Advocate for respondent No. 1/State.
Ms. Anuradha Singh, learned counsel for respondents No. 2 and 3/University.
By way of filing this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has sought following reliefs : –
(i) That, the Gold Medal List (Annexure P/4) may kindly be set asid in the interest of justice. (ii) That, the direction for issuing a Fresh Gold Medal List while adding the name of the present petitioner may kindly be issued against the respondent authorities in the interest of justice. Or (iii) That, the direction for deciding the representation (Annexure P/5) with the well-reasoned self-contained speaking order may kindly be issued against the respondent authorities in the interest of justice.
2. It is the submission of counsel for petitioner that she is meritorious student of M.A. English Literature, scored 78.60 marks in merit list and topped the said list in the academic session 2017-2019. Every year convocation ceremony is held in which meritorious students are awarded Gold Medal.
3. Grievance as echoed in the petition is that in t
The central legal point established in the judgment is the significance of University regulations, particularly Statute No. 10, in determining the criteria for awarding gold medals and the distinctio....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of Ordinance 5, which governed the award of Gold Medals based on the requirement of passing the entire course....
Academic institutions possess the autonomy to define specific criteria, such as the interpretation of 'first attempt' for awarding prizes like gold medals, and courts should generally not interfere i....
The court upheld the decision of the Writ Court based on the Senate Resolution and rejected the appellant's arguments regarding the university's previous status and regulations from other institution....
The benefit of revaluation should be considered for deserving candidates, and resolutions debarring candidates from receiving awards based on revised results are unsustainable and arbitrary.
The court applied the Rules of Interpretation and the Beneficial Rule of Interpretation to resolve ambiguity in the relevant clauses of Annexure VII, ensuring the petitioner's son received the benefi....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
