SUBODH ABHYANKAR, SATYENDRA KUMAR SINGH
YUNUS S/o REHMAT SHAH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent
JUDGMENT SUBODH ABHYANKAR, J. : – This appeal under section 374(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed by the appellant being aggrieved of his conviction and sentence.
The appellant stands convicted by the impugned judgment dated 28-7-2015, passed by the learned Special Judge (under NDPS Act), Mandsaur District Mandsaur (MP) in Special Sessions Trial No. 09/2012, whereby the learned Judge of the trial Court has sentenced him, as mentioned herein below : –
Accused Conviction Sentence Fine Amount Sentence in default of payment of fine Yunus s/o Rahmat Shah 8 read with 15(c) of NDPS Act 12 years Rigorous Imprisonment Rs. 1,00,000/- 1 Year RI
2. In brief, the facts of the case are that on 23-10-2011 at around 04.30 PM in the evening, the Police Mandsaur apprehended a truck bearing registration number UP-25 AT-5188 at Gram Dhandhoda Phanta on Bhavgarh-Dalauda Road. Although the truck did not initially spot, but it was chased by the Police in a Jeep and was stopped. After stopping the truck, two person got down and ran away from the spot, however, the Driver of the vehicle was caught then and there only, who informed his name to be Yunus s/o Rahmat Shah (the present ap
The court emphasized the importance of proving the case beyond reasonable doubt and considered procedural irregularities in the sampling process, leading to the appellant's entitlement to the benefit....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the prosecution to prove the safe custody of seized material under Section 55 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substan....
Sentence cannot be reduced to less than the minimum prescribed.
The court considered the appellant's personal circumstances in modifying the sentence under the N.D.P.S. Act.
The recovery of narcotic contraband must be in conformity with the provisions of the NDPS Act and the relevant instructions issued by the Narcotics Control Bureau.
Compliance with procedural safeguards under the NDPS Act, notably Section 52A, is essential to validate convictions; failure to produce seized contraband is fatal to the prosecution's case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.