SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 240

SANJAY DWIVEDI
Food Corporation of India – Appellant
Versus
Preetam Singh Kirar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
S.K. Rao with Vineet Kumar Pandey for petitioner; K.N. Pethia for respondent No. 1 to 7.

ORDER

1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed challenging the award dated 21.10.2013 (Annexure P/1) passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court (hereinafter referred to as ‘Tribunal’) mainly on the ground that the finding given by the Tribunal is illegal, erroneous and contrary to the evidence available on record. The award is beyond the scope of terms of the Reference and contrary to law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Steel Authority of India Limited and others v. National Union Waterfront Workers and others reported in (2001) 7 SCC 1. The facts of the case and the issue involved in the case lie in a narrow compass as would be clear from the narration of facts, which are as under :--

2. The petitioner Corporation is a statutory Corporation constituted under the Food Corporation of India Act, 1964 (for brevity ‘Act, 1964’). It deals in the business of food grains and it also imports, procures, stores and distributes the food grains throughout the country. The petitioner has offices and depots in all over the country and for the purpose of effective supervision, they have established Zonal Offices, Region

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top