SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 290

CHANDRESH KUMAR KHARE, ARUN MATHUR
C. P. Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Prabandh Sanchalak, M. P. Rajya Sahkari Avas Sangh Mydt. Bhopal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Sanjay Vajpai for appellant; D.K. Saxena for respondent.

vkns'k

1- vihykFkhZ }kjk ;g izFke vihy U;k;ky;] la;qDr iath;d ¼U;kf;d½ lgdkjh laLFkk,¡] e-iz- Hkksiky }kjk izdj.k Ø- 55¼2½&204@2017 esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 28-9-2019] ls O;fFkr gksdj e-iz- lgdkjh lkslk;Vh vf/kfu;e 1960 ¼ftls la{ksi esa ßvf/kfu;eß ds uke ls lacksf/kr fd;k tkosxkA dh /kkjk 78¼1½ varxZr izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

2- bl vihy ds yafcr jgus ds nkSjku vf/kdj.k esa ;qxyihB dh vuqiyCèkrk ds n`f"Vxr vihykFkhZ }kjk ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky;] eq[;ihB tcyiqj ds le{k fjV ;kfpdk Ø- 22928@2019 is'k dh xbZ ftls ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; }kjk vkns'k fnukad 23-11-22 }kjk fujkÑr djrs gq, vf/kdj.k dks funsZf'kr fd;k x;k gS fd vihykFkhZ }kjk ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; ds mDr vkns'k ds iUnzg fnol ds Hkhrj vkns'k dh izfrfyfi lfgr vihy vf/kdj.k ds le{k is'k fd, tkus dh n'kk esa ,slh vihy dk xq.k nks"kksa ij vihy izLrqfr ls 90 fnol ds Hkhrj fd;k tkuk lqfuf'pr gksA

3- izdj.k ds rF; laf{kIrr% bl izdkj gS fd vihykFkhZ] izR;FkhZ Ø- 2 laLFkk dk lsok;qDr gksdj vkyksP; vof/k esa dk;Zikyu ;a=h ds in ij inkafdr FkkA vihykFkhZ ds vuqlkj mldh fu;qfDr LFkk;h deZpkjh ds in ij laLFkk lapkyd eaMy@LVkQ lfefr }kjk fof/kor :i ls dh xbZ FkhA vihykFkhZ }kjk inh; drZO;ksa ds fuoZgu ds nkSjku mls fnukad 4-6-2011 dks dkj.k crkvks lwpuk i= iznku

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top