SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 403

ANAND PATHAK
Alok Shukla – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Brijesh Sharma for petitioner;
M. S. Jadon, Government Advocate for respondents/State.

ORDER

1. The present petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking following reliefs:--

(1) That the respondents be directed to finalize the pension case of the petitioner and restore the entire pension and other post-retire dues and make the payment of the arrears along with interest @ 10% per annum from the date the same became due till actual payment.

(2) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction in the nature of writ under Article 226 of the constitution of India as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in facts and circumstances of the case.

(3) Cost of the petition may also be awarded.

2. Precisely stated facts of the case are that petitioner at the relevant time was working as Assistant Engineer in the Public Works and Health Department and was posted at Maintenance Sub-Division, Motijheel, Gwalior. Due to personal difficulties, petitioner applied for voluntary retirement in the year 2009 as per the provision of rule 42 (1) (a) of M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976 (hereinafter referred as “Rules, 1976”) and as submitted petitioner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top