SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 437

S. A. DHARMADHIKARI
Naharsingh – Appellant
Versus
Raksha – Respondent


Advocates:
Chetan Jain for petitioners; Bhuwan Deshmukh on behalf of Advocate General for respondent No. 3/State.

ORDER

1. Heard on the question of admission and interim relief.

2. In this petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India, petitioners have challenged order dated 15.12.2022 passed in RCS A/275/2022 passed by Civil Judge, Junior Division Jobat Distt. Alirajpur and order 10.4.2022 passed in RCSA/50/2022 by the District Judge, Alirajpur whereby application under Order 39 rule 1 and 2 of the CPC filed by the respondent/plaintiffs has been allowed and confirmed.

3. Necessary facts for adjudication of this case are that respondents/plaintiffs have instituted a suit seeking the reliefs of declaration, partition and permanent injunction for the ancestral property(details are given in tabular form) on the basis of being daughterin-law of petitioner no.1 after the death of her husband – Dheerendra.

Serial No.

Property Gram Gherughati, Tehsil Azad Nagar, Alirajpur Area Nagar, Alirajpur

Area (in hectare)

1

Survey No. 135/3

0.150

2

Survey No. 163

0.450

3

Survey No. 167

0.550

4

Survey No. 225

0.190

5

Survey N

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top