SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 440

GAJENDRA SINGH
Sunehara Ansari (Smt. ) – Appellant
Versus
Iftakar Ansari – Respondent


Advocates:
Rohit Kumar Mangal for petitioner.

ORDER

1. This Miscellaneous Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred challenging the order dated 19.10.2023 by 22nd District Judge, Indore in EP No.4 of 2022 whereby the determination of petitioner's objection regarding admissibility of certificate purported to be issued by one Mohd. Ahmad under Section 65-B of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 marked as Exhibit P/24 has been postponed till the final disposal of case.

2. Brief facts of the case are that petitioner was elected as Counsellor of Ward No.60 of Indore Municipal Corporation in public election conducted on 6.7.2022. An election petition challenging the election of petitioner was filed which is pending before the 22nd District Judge, Indore as EP No.4 of 2022.

3. During the course of evidence of respondent No.1(PW-1), proposed certificate issued by one Mohd. Ahmad under Section 65-B of Indian Evidence Act was objected by the petitioner stating that the proposed certificate is not original document but photocopy, so it cannot be admitted as a valid evidence.

4. Objecting to the contentions of petitioner counsel for respondent No.1 urged that the proposed document is original which bears the signatures

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top