GAJENDRA SINGH
Sunehara Ansari (Smt. ) – Appellant
Versus
Iftakar Ansari – Respondent
ORDER
1. This Miscellaneous Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred challenging the order dated 19.10.2023 by 22nd District Judge, Indore in EP No.4 of 2022 whereby the determination of petitioner's objection regarding admissibility of certificate purported to be issued by one Mohd. Ahmad under Section 65-B of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 marked as Exhibit P/24 has been postponed till the final disposal of case.
2. Brief facts of the case are that petitioner was elected as Counsellor of Ward No.60 of Indore Municipal Corporation in public election conducted on 6.7.2022. An election petition challenging the election of petitioner was filed which is pending before the 22nd District Judge, Indore as EP No.4 of 2022.
3. During the course of evidence of respondent No.1(PW-1), proposed certificate issued by one Mohd. Ahmad under Section 65-B of Indian Evidence Act was objected by the petitioner stating that the proposed certificate is not original document but photocopy, so it cannot be admitted as a valid evidence.
4. Objecting to the contentions of petitioner counsel for respondent No.1 urged that the proposed document is original which bears the signatures
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.