SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 345

ARUN KUMAR SHARMA
Indrajeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Ajay Kumar Ojha for appellant; Mukund Agrawal, Govt. Advocate for respondents.

ORDER

1. By this first appeal under section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, the appellant has challenged the impugned judgment and decree dated 27.7.1999 passed by the District Judge, Bhopal in Civil Suit No. 2-A/1996, whereby learned trial Court dismissed the suit of the plaintiff and directing the defendants to refund Rs.3,310/- with interest @ 12% to the plaintiff till its realization.

2. The facts in brief culled out from the record and relevant for the purpose are that a notification to sell the subject land was issued on 28.1.1969 by the Nazul Officer, Bhopal for auction of certain plots situated in private sector E/2, E/3, E/4 and E/5 in Tatya Tope Nagar, near Habibganj, Bhopal town to be held on 26th, 27th and 28th February, 1969 at 11 A.M. Several plots located in various sectors referred to above were put to auction as scheduled. The plaintiff was declared as the highest bidder quoting price of Rs.33,100/- for plot No.15 in Sector E-2, Arera Colony Bhopal in the auction held on 26.2.1969. Pursuant thereto, 1/10th of the bid amount i.e. Rs.3,310/- was deposited by the appellant with the respondent authorities on 26.2.1969 at the spot subject to its confirmation. The balance a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top