SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 400

PRANAY VERMA
Jagdish Chandra – Appellant
Versus
Chandrakant – Respondent


Advocates:
Avinash Yadav for appellant.

ORDER

1. This appeal under section 100 of the CPC has been preferred by the plaintiff being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 7.9.2022 passed in Civil Appeal No.48/2019 by the Ist District Judge, Khargone, District Mandleshwar arising out of the judgment and decree dated 21.10.2019 passed in Civil Suit No.26-A/2017 by the IIIrd Civil Judge, Class-I, Khargone (East Nimar).

2. The following genealogical tree shows relationship between the parties:-

3. As per the plaintiff, the joint family of the parties held considerable joint family property situated at various villages. On 15.5.1996, an oral partition of the same was effected between them in which they were allotted different properties by way of their share. On 30-05-1996 a partition deed in terms of the oral partition was also executed between the parties. In the deed, it had been stipulated that the properties being allotted to Smt. Rampyari Bai would devolve upon the person who shall look after her during her lifetime. The plaintiff did so and also performed her last rites hence succeeded to the property allotted to her share. Upon death of Smt. Rampyari Bai, plaintiff and defendants are jointly recorded over her prope

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top