SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1203

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT INDORE
Amar Nath Kesharwani, J.
Sahiram – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 61818 of 2022
Decided On : 29-12-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Prafull Sharma, Advocate, Santosh Singh Thakur, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

Headnote:(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 8/15 - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 439 - Bail application - Applicant sought bail after being arrested for possession of 15 kg of poppy straw, which is less than commercial quantity - Applicant claims to be falsely implicated and without prior criminal record - Court allows bail upon conditions. (Paras 1-5)

(B) Criminal Procedure - Bail - The court finds no previous criminal record and concludes that due to the absence of likelihood of early trial conclusion, bail should be granted with stipulated conditions regarding appearances and future conduct. (Paras 3-5)

Table of Content
1. bail application context and charges. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments regarding bail request. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court's decision on bail conditions. (Para 5)

JUDGMENT

Amar Nath (Kesharwani), J. - This is the first application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking bail in connection with Crime No.134/2022 registered at Police Station - Ratangarh, District - Neemuch for the offence punishable under Section 8 /15 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act.

2. As per prosecution story, 15 kg of poppy straw was recovered from possession of the present applicant and he was arrested on 30.09.2022.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is an innocent person and has been falsely implicated in this case. The contraband so recovered from possession of the present applicant is less than the commercial quantity. The applicant is having no criminal antecedent. Investigation is complete and charge-sheet was filed on 21.11.2022. There is no likelihood of early conclusion of the trial, hence, prays for release of the applicant on bail.

4. Per contra, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent / State opposes the prayer for bail, but fairly concedes that the applicant has no previous criminal record.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the quantity of contraband seized from possession of the present applicant and the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, without commending on the merits of the case, the application is allowed with conditions. The applicant is directed to be released on bail upon his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before the trial Court on all dates of hearing as may be fixed in this behalf by the trial Court during the pendency of the trial and the applicant shall also abide by the conditions enumerated under Section 437(3) of the Cr.P.C. The applicant will not involve in any offence of the same in future in future. If the applicant is found involved in similar nature of cases, this order shall stand cancelled automatically without reference to the Court and the police will be at liberty to arrest the applicant in present case also.

Certified copy, as per Rules.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top