VIVEK AGARWAL
Manoj Kumar Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Vivek Agarwal, J. - Petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved of order dated 11/10.11.2022 issued by the Section Officer, Madhya Pradesh State Information Commission.
2. Petitioner's contention is that P.I.O. had rejected the application made by the appellant Sushil Kumar Mishra under RTI informing him that third party information cannot be supplied to him. Thereafter, appeal which was filed by Sushil Kumar Mishra was allowed by the First Appellate Authority and had directed the P.I.O. to supply information upto 07.11.2019.
3. Shri S.P. Rai has drawn attention of this Court to Annexure P-6 communication dated 05.07.2022 made by the present petitioner to point out that information as was sought by the appellant was provided to him vide communication dated 12.12.2019 but, later on, he moved an amendment application and sought information for two years for which though appellant was informed to approach the Office of P.I.O. on 06.06.2022 but on 13.06.2022, he appeared in the Office of the Executive Engineer and refuse to accept the information, thereafter appeared on 20.06.2022 and obtained complete information.
4. However, neither the communication asking the appellant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.