IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT GWALIOR
Deepak Kumar Agarwal, J.
Parshuram @ Sushil @ Sussi Gurjar – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.21065 of 2022
Decided On : 27-04-2022
Bail Application - Offence under Sections 306, 34 of IPC - The court allowed the bail application and ordered the release of the applicant on bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.25,000 with one solvent surety.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant filed a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for the offence punishable under Sections 306, 34 of IPC. The prosecution case involved the death of the applicant's wife due to strangulation, with allegations of harassment by the applicant and his family.
Finding of the Court:
The court, without commenting on the merits of the case, allowed the bail application, considering the completion of investigation and filing of the charge-sheet. The court ordered the release of the applicant on bail upon furnishing the specified bail bond and surety.
Issues: Bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for the offence under Sections 306, 34 of IPC.
Ratio Decidendi: The completion of investigation and filing of the charge-sheet, along with the undertaking of the applicant to cooperate in trial, influenced the court's decision to grant bail.
Final Decision: The court allowed the bail application and ordered the release of the applicant on bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.25,000 with one solvent surety.
JUDGMENT
Deepak Kumar agarwal, J. - This is the First bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C filed by the applicant for grant of bail.
The applicant is in custody since 28.2.2022 in connection with Crime No.21/2021 by Police Station Utila, District Gwalior (MP) for the offence punishable under Sections 306, 34 of IPC.
In brief the prosecution case is that on 15.2.2021 from Prime Hospital, City Center, Gwalior, an information has been sent to Police Station, University, that deceased Mamta Gurjar wife of present applicant died due to strangulation during treatment. On this information, Merg No.31/2021 was registered at police Station, University. Dead-body Panchnama was prepared. Dead-body was sent for postmortem. as per postmortem, she died due to asphyxia as a result of ante-mortem hanging. Merg was transferred to police Station Utila where Merg No.33/2021 was registered. Merg was enquired. During Merg enquiry, statements of father of the deceased Siyaram, brother Dushyant Singh, mother Kalawati and Dileep Singh Gurjar were recorded. They stated that marriage of the deceased was solemnized with present applicant 14 years ago. Out of the wedlock, one son Nandu was born. On 14.2.2021 deceased telephoned her mother, father and brother that her husband, father-in-law, Jethani and Jeth are harassing her. Dushyant Singh went to her maternal house and had a talk with her in-laws. They assured that henceforth she will be kept well. Next day, on 15.2.2021 information came that she died in Prime Hospital. after enquiry, Crime for the aforesaid offence was registered. applicant was arrested on 28.2.2022. Charge-sheet has been filed against present applicant and investigation in regard to other accused is pending under Section 173(8) of Cr.P.C.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. He is in custody since 28.2.2022. Investigation has been complete and charge-sheet has been filed. He undertakes to cooperate in trial. Conclusion of trial will take time. On such premises, learned counsel for the applicant prayed for bail.
Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer and prayed for dismissal of the application.
Looking to the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting upon the merits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the application should be allowed and by allowing the application it is ordered that if the applicant furnishes bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court, he should be released on bail.
He will present during trial before the trial Court on each and every date.
Application stands allowed and disposed of.
Certified copy as per rules.
The completion of investigation and filing of the charge-sheet, along with the undertaking of the applicant to cooperate in trial, are crucial factors in considering a bail application.
The court's decision emphasized the importance of the applicant's presence during the trial while allowing the bail application.
Grant of bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. based on the facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody.
The court may grant bail considering the circumstances of the case, the filing of the charge sheet, and the time it would take for the conclusion of the trial.
Grant of bail with the condition of cash security and a personal bail bond, emphasizing the need for the applicant to be present during the trial.
Grant of bail based on the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. in a case involving serious offences punishable under Sections 304-B, 498-A, 34, 120-B ....
The court has the discretion to grant bail based on the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case.
The court's decision to grant bail was influenced by the nature of the offence, the stage of the trial, and the likelihood of the applicant absconding or tampering with the prosecution case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.