IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT INDORE
Vivek Rusia, Amar Nath (Kesharwani), JJ.
M/s.Adroit Industries (India) Limited & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
Union of India & Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 2614 of 2021
Decided On : 08-04-2022
MEIS - Export Incentive Scheme - Paragraph 3.04 of Foreign Trade Policy 2015-20 - HBP 2015-20, Clause 3.13, 3.14, 3.15 - Customs Act - Public Notice No.88/2017 - The court discussed the MEIS scheme, the procedure for claiming benefits, the requirement of marking 'Y' in the shipping bills, the role of DGFT and Customs Department, and the provisions for amendment/conversion of shipping bills. The court emphasized the mandatory requirements under the scheme and the need for correction of shipping bills by the Customs Department before the DGFT could consider the claim.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners sought relaxation/condonation for not mentioning MEIS scheme in shipping bills, claiming clerical error and seeking benefits under the MEIS for exports made during 2017-18 & 2018-19. The DGFT rejected the application, leading to the filing of the present petition.
Finding of the Court:
The court dismissed the petition, stating that the petitioners should have approached the Customs Department for correction of shipping bills before seeking relief from the DGFT. The court directed the petitioners to approach the Customs Department for rectification and further consideration of their claim.
Issues: The main issue was the petitioners' failure to mark 'Y' in the shipping bills for availing MEIS benefits, leading to the rejection of their claim by the DGFT.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the mandatory requirements under the MEIS scheme and the need for correction of shipping bills by the Customs Department before the DGFT could consider the claim. The court also highlighted the provisions for amendment/conversion of shipping bills and the role of the Policy Relaxation Committee.
Final Decision: The petition was dismissed, but the petitioners were directed to approach the Customs Department for rectification of shipping bills, followed by consideration of their claim by an appropriate committee.
ORDER
Vivek Rusia, J. - The petitioners have filed the present petition seeking the following relief/s :
'(i) That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to declaration relaxation/condonation of the procedure lapse of non-mentioning of MEIS scheme in the shipping bills at the time of export as arbitrary and discriminative.
(ii) That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction ordering and directing the Respondent No.2 by themselves, their sub ordinate servants to award the MEIS to the petitioner on export of their products through the Shipping Bills issued during 2017-18 & 2018-19.
(iii) That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction ordering and directing the Respondent No.5 by themselves, their sub ordinate servants to issue no objection certificate in favour of the petitioner to certify that the goods were exported by the petitioner and they have realised the export proceeds.'
1. Petitioner No.1 is a Private Limited Company having its registered office at 1003, Meadows Building, Sahar Plaza Complex, JB Nagar, Andheri (East), Mumbai and factory at 44-59, Sector D2 Industrial Area, Sanwer Road, Indore. Petitioner No.1 is engaged in the manufacture of automobile parts. Petitioner No.2 is the Executive Director of petitioner No.1 company.
2. The Government of India has introduced the Merchandise Export from India Scheme (MEIS) as a Foreign Trade Policy 201520 which has now been discontinued for the export w.e.f. 1.1.2021. Under the scheme, incentives were given to the Indian exporters in terms of Duty Credit Scrips @ 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7% of the FOB value of realized exports made during the validity period. The process of availing the aforesaid benefit is provided under the scheme itself and according to which, at the time of filing of shipping bills, if the HS Code of the exported product is under the eligible code list (Appendix 3B of MEIS) then the exporter is required to mark 'Yes' by clicking 'Y' in the rewards column of the shipping bill. All such 'Yes' marked shipping bills are transferred from the Customs Database to the DGFT database electronically. Once the payment for these shipments is realized, the exporter requests the concerned bank to generate and upload an electronic Bank Realization Certificate (eBRC) on the DGFT server. After this, for every IEC (exporter), the DGFT database has details of goods exported and the consequent realization amount. Thereafter, the exporter was required to lodge the portal where his electronic date is available to him in DGFT online repository and tag the individual shipping bills in the online application with e-BRC and an application is submitted. Under the provisions of the scheme, without electronic data of shipping bills being transmitted from the Customs server, such shipping bills are not present in the DGFT repository and a claim under MEIS cannot be applied by the exporter for the relevant shipping bills.
3. The case of the present petitioners is that as per Paragraph 3.04 of Foreign Trade Policy 2015-20 for the period from 2017-18 and 2018-19 and 2-19-20 the petitioner could not avail the benefit of MEIX due to the clerical error as they could not tick 'Y' (for Yes) in the reward column of shipping bills. Under these circumstances, the system automatically treated the shipping bills as 'N' (for No) in the reward column of the shipping bills.
4. The case of the petitioner is that during the relevant period i.e. 2015-20 the petitioner was entitled to avail the benefit of MEIS but could not avail of such benefit as did not declare the intention by ticking or marking 'Y' (for Yes) in the shipping bills. Since the aforesaid mistake was committed by several exporters, therefore, the DGFT with a view to promoting the exports from India issued Trade Notice No. 24/2018 dated 21.2.2018 asking the exporters to submit their applications in a proper format. The petitioner has a
The judgment emphasizes the mandatory requirements under the MEIS scheme and the need for correction of shipping bills by the Customs Department before seeking relief from the DGFT.
Inadvertent procedural errors corrected under legal provisions do not invalidate substantive claims under export incentive schemes; administrative processes should facilitate, not hinder, the realiza....
Procedural mistakes should not deprive exporters of the benefit of the reward under the Merchandise Exports from India Scheme (MEIS) if they have fulfilled their export obligations.
Procedural lapses in declaring intent on shipping bills do not negate eligibility for MEIS benefits when substantive conditions are satisfied.
Foreign Trade Policy - No time limit can be read into the said provision nor can it be introduced by way of a circular. It is well-settled that a subordinate legislation cannot travel beyond parent s....
The court's decision was influenced by the interpretation of the Foreign Trade Policy, 2015-2020, and the application of Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962 in allowing the petitioner's request for ....
Did the CESTAT fall into error in upholding the denial of the petitioner’s claim for amendment of its shipping document under section 149 of the Customs Act.
Inadvertent errors in marking 'Y' or 'N' in the reward column of shipping bills should not result in the denial of MEIS benefits.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.