IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Vivek Agarwal, J.
Yuvraj Pandre & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 15807 of 2022
Decided On : 30-03-2022
Bail - Wildlife Protection Act - The court granted bail to the applicants under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, considering that they were falsely implicated and that no substantial recovery of any wildlife article was made from them. The applicants were directed to comply with the provisions of Section 437(3) of the Cr. P. C. and to follow COVID-19 guidelines upon release.
Fact of the Case:
The applicants filed for bail under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C, stating that they were falsely implicated in a case under the Wildlife Protection Act and that their service careers would be in jeopardy if they remained in custody.
Finding of the Court:
The court, after considering the facts and circumstances of the case, granted bail to the applicants, without commenting on the merits of the matter. The applicants were directed to comply with certain conditions and COVID-19 guidelines upon release.
Issues: Grant of bail under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C, false implication of the applicants, potential jeopardy to the service careers of the applicants, lack of substantial recovery of wildlife articles from the applicants.
Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the applicants were falsely implicated and that no substantial recovery of wildlife articles was made from them, leading to the decision to grant bail.
Final Decision: The court granted bail to the applicants, directing them to comply with certain conditions and COVID-19 guidelines upon release.
JUDGMENT
Vivek agarwal, J. - This is first application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity "Cr.P.C") for grant of bail to the applicants-Yuvaraj Pandre and Brajesh Maravi, who are in custody since 12/03/2022 in connection with Crime No.2659/44 registered at Forest Range Officer, West Baihar, General, District Balaghat for the offence punishable under Sections 2(26B), 2(33), 2(35), 2(37), 9, 39, 48a, 49, 49B, 50 & 51, Wild Life Protection act, 1972.
It is submitted that they have been made accused on the memorandum of main accused-Rohit Kumar Lilhare, Sri Ram Meravi, Venkatram Saiyam who have been arrested from the spot and from whose possession one live Pangolian was recovered along with one Khukhari. applicants are employee of NDRF and BSF. They have no complicity. They have been falsely implicated only on the basis of some call details. If applicants are made to face incarceration for long, then their service carrier will be in jeopardy and more over no substantial recovery of any wildlife article/floppy has been recovered from the present applicant. Hence, prayer is made to enlarge the applicant on bail.
Learned Dy. Govt. advocate for the non-applicant/State opposes the application.
after hearing counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the fact that the applicants have been made accused on the basis of memorandum of main accused and other facts & circumstances of the case, this Court is of the considered opinion that it is a fit case for grant of bail to the applicant. Hence, without commenting anything on merits of the matter, this application is allowed.
It is directed that applicant shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only) with two solvent sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court for his appearance before the Court on the dates given by the concerned Court during pendency of trial. It is further directed that the applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 437(3) of the Cr. P. C.
This order shall be effective till the end of the trial, however, in case of bail jump and breach of any of the pre-condition of bail, it shall become ineffective.
In view of the outbreak of new mutant Omicron of COVID-19, the jail authorities and the State Government are directed to follow the guidelines issued by the Health Ministry in the wake of Novel Corona Virus before and after releasing the applicant.
Certified copy as per rules.
AI
Grant of bail based on false implication and lack of substantial recovery of wildlife articles.
The court established that prolonged detention without trial can justify the granting of bail, emphasizing the balance between personal liberty and the seriousness of the charges.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's discretion to grant bail based on the completion of investigation, the time trial would take, and the lack of requirement for custodial....
The lack of Test Identification Parade and the basis of the applicant's accusation influenced the court's decision to grant bail.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.