SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 933

VIVEK RUSIA, AMAR NATH (KESHARWANI)
Leena – Appellant
Versus
Shri Manish – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ms. Swati Ukhale, Learned Counsel, for the Appellant; Shri. Yashpal Rathore, Learned Counsel, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. Appellant(wife) has filed the present appeal challenging the ex-parte judgment dated 21.04.2007 and order dated 25.08.2007 whereby an application under Order 9 Rule 13 read with section 151 of C.P.C. has been dismissed.

The facts of the case in short are as under:-

As per admitted facts, the marriage of the appellant(wife) and respondent (Husband) was solemnized on 21.02.2005 under the Hindu customs and rituals at Indore and they have no issue from the aforesaid wedlock.

2. The respondent (Husband) filed a petition under Section 13, 13(1) A of the Hindu Marriage Act seeking dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty. According to him after the marriage, the behavior of the appellant(wife) was not cordial with him as well as his family members. She used to walk up at 09-10 AM and created a situation that caused atrocities to his mother. She used to quarrel with his mother and sister on the petty issue. She was in habit of threatening and pressuring him to live with her parents otherwise she would commit suicide. She used to threaten for false implications in the criminal case. On 13.04.2005, she wanted to go to her parent's house, but his mother did not give permissi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top