SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 996

SHEEL NAGU, MANINDER S. BHATTI
Kanak Kumar Shrivastava – Appellant
Versus
Registrar General – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Miss Nirmala Nayak, Advocate, for the Appellant, Shri Akshay Dharmadhikari, Advocate, for the Respondent.

ORDER

1. The petitioner has approached this Court by way of filing the present petition while praying for quashment of order dated 10/10/2011 (Annexure P/1), order dated 25/09/2014 (Annexure P/2) and order dated 03/11/2014 (Annexure P/3). The petitioner has further prayed for issuance of a Writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents to pay the petitioner arrears of salary for the period of suspension commencing from 05/08/2008 to 10/10/2011 along with interest.

2. The petitioner herein while working against the post of Criminal Reader in the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jabalpur, was caught red handed in a trap case accepting bribe of Rs.10/- from complainant-Ghanshyam for adjourning the case of the complainant which was pending in the concerned Court. Record reveals that on 21/07/2008, the petitioner was caught red handed by the Vigilance Authority of this Court and, the petitioner was found in possession of amount in his pocket for which no reasonable explanation was furnished by him.

3. Resultantly, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Madhya Pradesh Civil Services (Classification Control and Appeal) Rules 1966, (hereinafter referred to as 'Act o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top