IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT INDORE
Subodh Abhyankar, J.
Deepak S/o Mansingh Narvariya – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.9320 of 2022
Decided On : 22-02-2022
Madhya Pradesh Excise act, 1915 - Bail Application - Possession of Unauthorized Liquor
Fact of the Case:
The applicant filed a bail application under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, in connection with a case registered for possession of unauthorized liquor. The applicant was in custody and sought bail due to the expected lengthy trial process.
Finding of the Court:
The Court allowed the bail application, considering the fact that only one case under Section 34 (2) of the Madhya Pradesh Excise act, 1915 had been registered against the applicant, and the trial was likely to take a long time. The Court directed the applicant to be released on bail with specified conditions.
Issues: Bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for possession of unauthorized liquor, opposition by the State, and consideration of the number of cases and expected trial duration.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court's decision was influenced by the fact that only one case under Section 34 (2) of the Madhya Pradesh Excise act, 1915 was registered against the applicant, and the trial was expected to be lengthy.
Final Decision: The bail application was allowed, and the applicant was directed to be released on bail with specified conditions.
JUDGMENT
Subodh abhyankar, J. - This first application under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 has been filed by applicant, who is implicated in connection with Crime No.1705/2021 registered at Police Station Lasudiya, Indore District Indore (MP) for offence punishable under Section 34 (2) of the Madhya Pradesh Excise act, 1915.
The applicant is in custody since 24.12.2021.
The allegation against the applicant is that he was found involved in possession of 54.75 bulk liters of unauthorized liquor which was being transported in an auto Rickshaw bearing registration number MP-09 Ta-1597.
Counsel for the applicant has submitted that three cases (out of total six cases) under Sections 34 (1) of the Madhya Pradesh Excise act, 1915 have been registered against the applicant; and this is the first offence of the present applicant under Section 34 (2) of the Madhya Pradesh Excise act, 1915. The charge sheet has already been filed and the final conclusion of the trial is likely to take sufficiently long time.
Hence, it is prayed that the application be allowed and the applicant be released on bail.
Learned counsel for the respondent / State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer.
Having considered the rival submissions and on perusal of the case diary and taking note of the fact that only one case under Section 34 (2) of the Madhya Pradesh Excise act, 1915 has been registered against the applicant (which is the present case) and the other cases include under Section 34 (1) of the MP Excise act as well as the final conclusion of the trial is likely to take sufficiently long time, this Court finds force with the contention raised by the counsel for the applicant.
Accordingly, without adverting to the merits of the case, the application filed by the applicant is hereby allowed. The applicant is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court for his appearance as and when directed. The applicant shall be abide by the conditions as enumerated under Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C.
It is made clear that, after being released on bail, if the applicant again indulges himself in any criminal activity, the present bail order shall stand cancelled without further reference to the Court and the police shall be entitled to arrest the applicant in the present case also.
Certified copy, as per rules.
The Court considered the number of cases and the expected trial duration in granting bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for possession of unauthorized liquor.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the length of custody, the quantity of seized unauthorized liquor, and the absence of any case registered under the relevant provision infl....
The court considered the absence of seized items, lack of criminal past record, and potential trial delay as grounds for granting bail under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.
The main legal point established is that the court may grant bail under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, based on the period of incarceration and the quantity seized from the applica....
The court considered the filing of the charge sheet and the precedent of granting bail to co-accused persons under similar circumstances in allowing the bail application.
The court's decision to grant bail was based on the considerations of the duration of custody, absence of criminal antecedents, and the likelihood of a lengthy trial, as provided under Section 439 of....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of legal evidence to connect an accused with an alleged offence under the M.P. Excise Act, influencing the court's decision to g....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.