SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1646

VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
Sintu – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Omprakash Solanki, Advocate, Viraj Godha, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

JUDGMENT

Vijay Kumar Shukla, J. - This is first application under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. filed on behalf of the applicant who is in jail since 13.11.2021 in connection with Crime No.1414/2021 registered at Police Station Lasudiya, Indore for the offence punishable under Sections 356, 379 and 392 of IPC.

Learned counsel for applicant submits that nothing has been recovered from the possession of applicant. It is stated that snatched chain has been recovered from the possession of co-accused Krishna. It is further submitted that applicant is in jail since 13.11.2021. Investigation is over and chargesheet has been filed. In these circumstances the applicant be released on bail.

Learned Panel Lawyer opposed the application by submitting that as p er memorandum under section 27 of Evidence act, it is admitted that applicant was part of the group of persons who were involved in chain snatching.

However, taking into consideration that there was no seizure from the applicant and investigation has already been completed, I am of the opinion that applicant is entitled for grant of bail. Therefore, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, the application is allowed.

It is directe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top