SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1508

VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
Vikram – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ashish Gupta, Advocate, Viraj Godha, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

JUDGMENT

Vijay Kumar Shukla, J. - This is the first bail application under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. filed on behalf of the applicant. The applicant is in custody since 09/10/2021 in connection with Crime No.881/2021 registered at Police Manawar, District Dhar (M.P.) under Sections 458, 294, 323, 427, 506, 34, 307, 354-a and 354-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 read with Section 67 and 67-a of the Information Technology act, 2000.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in the statement of complainant Kusumbai recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. she has not named present applicant Vikram. The name of the present applicant has also not named in the FIR and in the statement recorded under Section 161 of Cr.P.C.

Learned Panel Lawyer for the State opposes the bail application. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into consideration the fact that applicant is in jail since 09/10/2021, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled for grant of bail. Therefore, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, the bail application is allowed.

It is directed that applicant - Vikram S/o Nemichand @ Nemu shall be released from custody upon fur

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top