SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1603

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT GWALIOR
Deepak Kumar Agarwal, J.
Ali Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.6801 of 2022
Decided On : 08-02-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Anshu Gupta, Advocate, Ramadhar Choubey, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

Grant of bail based on the facts and circumstances of the case without commenting upon the merits of the case.

Headnote:

Bail Application - Offence under Sections 302, 34 of IPC - The court allowed the bail application based on the facts and circumstances of the case without commenting upon the merits of the case, ordering the applicant's release on bail upon furnishing a bail bond.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant was arrested in connection with an offence under Sections 302, 34 of IPC for the murder of a shopkeeper. The prosecution alleged that the applicant, along with others, was involved in the murder, and the charge-sheet had been filed after investigation.

Finding of the Court:

The court, without commenting upon the merits of the case, allowed the bail application based on the facts and circumstances of the case, ordering the applicant's release on bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.25,000 with one solvent surety in the like amount.

Issues: The main issue was the grant of bail to the applicant who was accused of a serious offence under Sections 302, 34 of IPC.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the facts and circumstances of the case and decided to grant bail to the applicant without commenting upon the merits of the case.

Final Decision: The court allowed the bail application and ordered the release of the applicant on bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.25,000 with one solvent surety in the like amount.

JUDGMENT

Deepak Kumar agarwal, J. - This is the first bail application u/S. 439 of Cr.P.C. filed by the applicant for grant of bail.

The applicant was arrested on 28.10.2021 in connection with Crime No.226/2021 by Police Station Kotwali, District Sheopur (M.P.) for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 34 of IPC.

In brief, the prosecution case is that on 14.05.2021, complainant Pankaj Shivhare, has lodged a report at Kotwali, Sheopur that from last three years he is working as salesman at a liquor Company at Sheopur and from the last 20 days at Shop No.4 of the liquor company deceased Santosh, resident of Lalitpur, was also doing work of salesman. Due to lock down, they were doing chowkidhar of the shop. On 13.05.2021 at 7 P.M., deceased Santosh saying that he has to go outside. When he did not return after some time at 8.39 P.M., he telephoned on his mobile, he replied that he will come after some time. When he did not return, he went behind the shop and saw that the deceased Santosh is lying down on the land and on his body blood was oozing out. He telephoned his owner Rajiv Shivhare. Thereafter, Police came on that spot and informed his family members. on his chest incised wound of knife was found. On his complaint, offence under Sections 302, 34 of IPC against unknown persons was registered. Postmortem was conducted. During investigation applicant/accused was apprehended after five and a half months of the incident. at his behest, four empty bottle of country made liquour was seized and statement of one witness Devendra was recorded after five and a half months of the incident on 28.10.2021. In his statement, he has stated that he listened after five and half months at 8 P.M., applicant/accused ali and Kuber talking that Shadik, Shanu Dohre, Irshad alongwith them went to by a liquor, there a dispute arose. During which, Shadik killed the shop keeper. applicant/accused was arrested on 28.10.2021.

After investigation, charge-sheet has been filed.

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant is innocent. He has been falsely implicated in the case. He is in custody since 28.10.2021. He is ready to abide all the terms and conditions which may be imposed by this Court. Therefore, prayed for grant of bail.

Learned State counsel has vehemently opposed the bail application and prays for its rejection.

Looking to the facts and circumstances of this case without commenting upon the merits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the application should be allowed and by allowing the application it is ordered that if the applicant furnishes bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five thousand only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court, he should be released on bail.

He will present during trial before the trial Court on each and every date.

Application stands allowed and disposed of.

Certified copy as per rules.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top