G. S. AHLUWALIA
Laxman Rao – Appellant
Versus
Court of Third Additional Sessions Judge, Guna – Respondent
JUDGMENT
ORDER
1. This criminal revision under Section 397/401 of CrPC has been filed against the order dated 26.09.2019 passed by First Additional Sessions Judge, Guna in Criminal Appeal No.251/2018, by which the order dated 01.09.2018 passed by JMFC, Guna in Criminal Case No. 145/2013 has been affirmed.
2. The necessary facts for disposal of the present revision in short are that one trial under Sections 120-B and 412 of IPC was pending in S.T. No. 118/2010 on the allegations that on 13.07.2009 one Rakesh Jain, who was travelling in a bus, was looted and an amount of Rs.20.00 lacs was taken away. The applicant was one of the seizure witness of the looted amount. He appeared in the trial and stated in his examination-in-chief that the accused namely Ramkumar Niranjan had made a memorandum and had disclosed that he has kept his share of Rs.80,000/- in his village Pahada and, accordingly, an amount of Rs.80,000/- was seized from the house of the accused vide seizure memo Ex. P-7. Since the applicant had given the incorrect evidence, therefore, he was declared hostile and in cross-examination by the Public Prosecutor, he corrected himself and submitted that in fact, the amount of Rs.80,
Pritish vs. State of Maharashtra and others reported in (2002) 1 SCC 253
MS. Sheriffv. State of Madras AIR 1954 SC 397 : 1954 Cri LJ 1019
Iqbal Singh Marwah and another vs. Meenakshi Marwah and another reported in (2005) 4 SCC 370
The intentional change of version by a witness to weaken the prosecution case warrants prosecution under Section 195 of CrPC, and a preliminary inquiry is not mandatory in such cases.
The necessity of a preliminary inquiry and recording of satisfaction regarding deliberate or intentional falsehood before initiating a prosecution for perjury, and the importance of providing an oppo....
The court emphasized that a prospective accused can only be summoned under Section 319 Cr.P.C. if strong and cogent evidence emerges, not merely based on allegations or inconsistencies in witness sta....
In criminal cases based on circumstantial evidence, the prosecution must establish a complete chain of circumstances pointing to guilt, excluding all reasonable hypotheses of innocence.
The right to speedy trial is an inalienable right under Article 21 of the Constitution, and the court must consider the expediency in the interest of justice before filing a complaint for false charg....
The issuance of process in serious criminal offenses must not be mechanical; proper evaluation of evidence and roles of each accused is essential for establishing a prima facie case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.