SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1509

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT INDORE
Vivek Rusia, J.
Dilip@ Dillu – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.1441 of 2022
Decided On : 12-01-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Ashish Gupta, Advocate, Sachin Jaiswal, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

Grant of bail based on lack of conclusive evidence and the period of custody.

Headnote:

Bail Application - M.P. Excise Act - The court granted bail to the applicant under Section 439, Cr.P.C. due to lack of conclusive evidence and the period of custody, imposing conditions for his release.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant was in custody for the possession of spurious liquor, but the prosecution's evidence was not conclusive.

Finding of the Court:

The court granted bail to the applicant considering the period of custody and the lack of conclusive evidence against him.

Issues: Bail application under Section 439, Cr.P.C. for possession of spurious liquor.

Ratio Decidendi: Grant of bail due to lack of conclusive evidence and the period of custody.

Final Decision: The bail application was allowed, and the applicant was directed to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and surety, with conditions for appearance and attendance at the police station.

JUDGMENT

Vivek Rusia, J. - This is the first bail application under Section 439, Cr.P.C. for grant of bail in connection with Crime No.646/2021, Police-Station- Mandav Nagar, District-Ujjain (M.P.) for the commission of offences under Section 49-a and 34 of M.P. Excise act. The applicant is in custody since 29.10.2021.

2. as per prosecution case, 05 bulk liters of spurious liquor has been recovered from the possession of the applicant and on the basis of which the case has been registered against the applicant.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant has submits that applicant has falsely been implicated in the case. Charge sheet has been filed. Conclusion of trial will take sufficient long time. The offence is triable by Judicial Magistrate First Class. The Co-accused persons have already been granted bail by this Court. Under these circumstances, learned counsel for the applicant prays for grant of bail to the applicant.

4. Learned panel lawyer for the respondent/State opposes the bail application by submitting that as per the case-diary, total 16 litre of liquor was recovered from the house of the co-accused person but the police has made it 6 litre, 5 litre and 5 litre recovery between all the three member including co-accused person. However, she has fairly admitted that there is no FSL report to confirm that the liquor so recovered is spurious or unfit for human consumption.

5. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, looking to the period of custody, the evidence collected against the present applicant and without further commenting anything on the merits of the case, it would be appropriate to enlarge the applicant on bail.

6. accordingly, the bail application is allowed and he is directed to be released on bail upon his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.40,000/- (Rupees Forty Thousand only) with surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court for his appearance before that Court during the pendency of trial and shall also abide by the conditions enumerated under section 437(3) Cr.P.C.

7. By way of abundant caution, it is further directed that the applicant will also mark his presence in the concerned police station on first Monday of every month between 10 a.m. To 12 noon during the pendency of the trial. any default in attendance in Court and marking his presence in the concerned police station would result in cancellation of bail granted by this Court thereby entitling the police to take the applicant in custody immediately.

8. Before releasing the applicant from custody, the jail authorities are directed to medically examine in order to rule out the possibility of COVID -19 infections and shall comply with the direction given by the Hon'ble apex Court in Writ Petition No.1/2020.

Certified copy, as per rules.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top