SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1463

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT INDORE
Subodh Abhyankar, J.
Harisingh @ Haresingh S/o Ramesh Rathore – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.64616 of 2021
Decided On : 04-01-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Vinod Thakur, Advocate, Viraj Godha, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

The court's decision was based on the applicant's entitlement to bail under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, considering the facts and circumstances of the case.

Headnote:

Bail - Abetment of Suicide - The court allowed the applicant's bail application under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, finding that the applicant deserves to be released on bail based on the facts and circumstances of the case.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant is implicated for abetting the suicide of his wife. The applicant's counsel argued that the allegation of abetment is false due to personal animosity and presented evidence of the deceased being stalked by another person.

Finding of the Court:

The court found force with the contentions raised by the applicant's counsel and granted bail without adverting to the merits of the case.

Issues: The main issue was whether the applicant should be granted bail in a case involving abetment of suicide.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the facts and circumstances of the case and decided that the applicant deserves to be released on bail.

Final Decision: The applicant was directed to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and surety, with conditions for regular appearance before the trial court and adherence to bail conditions.

JUDGMENT

Subodh abhyankar, J. - This is the applicant's first application under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, as he is implicated in connection with Crime No.409/2021 registered at Police Station Rajgarh, District Dhar (MP) for offence punishable under Section 306 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The applicant is in custody since 22.10.2021.

The allegation against the applicant is that he abetted the suicide of his wife Sapna, who committed suicide on 21.09.2021, after consuming celphos.

Counsel for the applicant has submitted that the deceased had left for her matrimonial home on 23.03.2021 and had stayed their until she committed suicide on 21.09.2021; and as such, she was not at all in touch with the applicant and thus, the allegation of abetment is false allegation only on account of personal animosity between the parties.

It is submitted that the deceased was stalked by another person Sanju, with whom the applicant had a fight and First Information Report (FIR) regarding which has also been registered vide Crime No.118/2021 at Police Station Rajgarh, District Rajgarh (MP). Thereafter, the applicant and the deceased also had some altercations and thereafter, she left for her maternal house and subsequently committed suicide.

Counsel has also submitted that the applicant is in jail since 22.10.2021, the charge sheet has already been filed and the final conclusion of the trial is likely to take sufficiently long time.

Counsel for the respondent / State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer and it is submitted that no case for grant of bail is made out.

Having considered the rival submissions and on perusal of the case diary, this Court finds force with the contentions raised by the learned counsel for the applicant; and on the aforementioned facts and circumstances of this case, this Court is of the considered opinion that the applicant deserves to be released on bail.

accordingly, without adverting to the merits of the case, the application filed by the applicant is hereby allowed. The applicant is directed to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (rupees fifty thousand) with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his / her regular appearance before the trial Court during trial with a condition that he / she shall remain present before the Court concerned during trial and shall also abide by the conditions enumerated under Section 437 (3) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.

It is also observed that if the applicant is found to be involved in any criminal activities, after his / her release on bail, then the present bail order shall stand cancelled without further reference to this Court; and the State / prosecution will be free to arrest the accused in the present case also.

This order shall be effective till the end of the trial, however, in case of bail jump, it shall become ineffective.

Certified copy as per rules.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top