SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 665

VIVEK RUSIA
Collector – Appellant
Versus
Jujhar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Veer Kumar Jain, Advocate, Akshat Pahadia, Advocate, Vaibhav Bhagwat, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. The State of M.P. and another have filed this second appeal against the judgment dtd. 29/7/2016 passed by Civil Judge, Class-I Garoth, District Mandsaur whereby the suit filed by the respondents/plaintiffs has been decreed and also against the judgment dtd. 9/11/2017 whereby RCA no.3-A/2017 has been dismissed by Additional District Judge, Bhanpura Link Court Garoth District Mandsaur. The facts of the case in short are as under:-

2. The respondents/plaintiffs have filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction in respect of agricultural land bearing survey no.619/1476 admeasuring 1.079 Hectare situated in village Shamgarh Tehsil Garoth District Mandsaur ("hereinafter referred to as the suit land"). According to the respondents/plaintiffs, this suit land was recorded in the name of their forefathers in the revenue record from 1958-1959. After their death, they are in the possession and cultivating the suit land. In the year 2013 family partition took place and this suit land came into the share of the family of plaintiffs. They applied demarcation of the suit land before Tehsildar. When the demarcation was not carried out, a complaint was made to the Collector in Ja

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top