SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 661

DEEPAK KUMAR AGARWAL
Sarvar Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rahul Bansal, Advocate, V.P.S. Tomar, Advocate, Ramrajya Singh Dangi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Deepak Kumar Agarwal, J. - This is sixth bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C filed by the applicant for grant of bail. Earlier all the bail applications were dismissed as withdrawn by co-ordinate Bench of this Court.

2. Applicant has been arrested on 22.01.2019 by Police Station- Sironj, District Vidisha in connection with Crime No.16/2019 for the offence punishable under Sections 363, 366, 376(2)(N), 368 and 120-B of IPC and Section 5/6 of POCSO Act.

3. As per prosecution case, on 17.01.2019, father of the prosecutrix lodged the missing report alleging that when he was sleeping with his wife, at that time at about 3:00 in the night wife of the complainant informed him that their daughter is not at home. Thereafter, the father of the girl went to the police station and raised suspicion on present applicant accused. During the investigation the prosecutrix was recovered at Inodre on 22.01.2019. Statements of prosecutrix were recorded in which she has stated that she was having friendship with present applicant accused and applicant accused told the girl that he will sent some other person to take her. Therefore, as per complainant, when in the night present applicant accused calle

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top