IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Anand Pathak, J.
Abhishek Malviya – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. – Respondents
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 3719 of 2023
Decided On : 23-01-2023
Bail Application - Offences under IPC and Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes Act - The court granted bail to the applicant based on the absence of a criminal record, lack of merit commentary, and the undertaking to cooperate in the trial.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant filed a bail application after being in judicial custody for offences under IPC and Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes Act. The prosecution witnesses did not support the story of prosecution and were declared hostile.
Finding of the Court:
The court allowed the bail application, considering the absence of a criminal record for the applicant and without commenting on the merits of the case.
Issues: The main issue was the grant of bail to the applicant who had been in judicial custody for the mentioned offences.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the absence of a criminal record for the applicant and the lack of commentary on the merits of the case in granting bail.
Final Decision: The bail application was allowed, and the applicant was directed to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and complying with specified conditions.
JUDGMENT
Anand Pathak, J. - The applicant has filed this first bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C for grant of bail, who has been in judicial custody since 27.05.2022 in connection with Crime No.119/2022 registered at Police Station-Sukhi Sevania, District-Bhopal for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366, 376(2)(N) of IPC and Section 3(1)(w), 3(2)(v) of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes Act.
2. It is the submission of learned counsel for the applicant that he is suffering confinement since 27.05.2022 and material prosecution witnesses including the prosecutrix have been examined. They did not support the story of prosecution and declared hostile, therefore, chance of tampering with evidence/witnesses is remote. It is further submitted that it is the case of false implication and dispute erupted because of fact that prosecutrix being scolded by her brother. The applicant does not bear any criminal record. Confinement amounts to pre-trial detention. He undertakes to cooperate in trial and would make himself available as and when required. The applicant would not be a source of embarrassment and harassment to the complainant party. Under these grounds, he prayed for bail.
3. Learned Government Advocate for the State opposed the prayer and prayed for its dismissal.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties at length and perused the case diary.
5. Considering the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and the fact that applicant does not bear any criminal record but without commenting on the merits of the case, the application is allowed. It is hereby directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court.
6. This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicant :-
1. The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him;
2. The applicant will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;
3. The applicant will not indulge himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused;
5. The applicant shall not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial;
6. The applicant shall not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be;
7. The applicant shall not be a source of embarrassment/harassment to the complainant party and shall not move in their vicinity in any manner, otherwise benefit of bail shall be immediately withdrawn.
8. Application stands allowed and disposed of.
9. A copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for compliance and information.
Certified copy as per rules.
The court has the discretion to grant bail, considering the nature of the offences, confinement of the applicant, and the undertaking of the applicant to cooperate and not cause any embarrassment or ....
Granting bail based on false case allegation and the applicant's willingness to cooperate in trial and investigation, with specific conditions to be followed upon release.
Granting bail based on the improbable nature of the allegations, the medical report, and the applicant's undertaking to cooperate in the trial and investigation.
The court may grant bail based on factors such as the status of co-accused and the expected duration of the trial, without commenting on the merits of the case.
The court has the discretion to grant bail after considering the peculiar fact situation and the willingness of the applicant to cooperate in the trial.
The court may grant bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C based on factors such as lack of criminal history and readiness to abide by specified conditions, without commenting on the merits of the case.
Granting bail based on the reduced chance of tampering with evidence due to the examination of material prosecution witnesses and the period of custody.
The court may grant anticipatory bail based on the absence of the applicant's name in the FIR, lack of criminal record, and the nature of allegations against the applicant, while imposing stringent c....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.