IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT GWALIOR
Anand Pathak, J.
Kalla @ Vidyaram – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
M.Cr.C. No. 10894 of 2022
Decided On : 07-03-2022
Bail Application - Offence under Sections 302, 323, 294, 506, 34 of IPC - The court granted bail to the applicant based on the fact that material prosecution witnesses had been examined, reducing the chance of tampering with evidence. The court imposed stringent conditions for bail, including a personal bond and sureties, cooperation in the investigation/trial, and marking presence at the police station every Monday.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant filed a bail application for an offence under Sections 302, 323, 294, 506, 34 of IPC, stating that a false case had been registered against him and that he had been in custody since 08-07-2020.
Finding of the Court:
The court considered the period of custody and the examination of material prosecution witnesses, and granted bail to the applicant with stringent conditions.
Issues: The main issue was whether the applicant should be granted bail considering the nature of the offence and the period of custody.
Ratio Decidendi: The court granted bail based on the reduced chance of tampering with evidence due to the examination of material prosecution witnesses and the period of custody.
Final Decision: The court allowed the bail application and imposed stringent conditions, including a personal bond, sureties, cooperation in the investigation/trial, and marking presence at the police station every Monday.
ORDER
1. The applicant has filed this fourth bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C for grant of bail. Applicant has been arrested on 08-07-2020 by Police Station Devgarh, District Morena in connection with Crime No.74/2020 registered for offence punishable under Sections 302, 323, 294, 506, 34 of IPC. His earlier bail applications were dismissed as withdrawn.
2. It is the submission of learned counsel for the applicant that false case has been registered against him and he is suffering confinement since 08-07-2020 and material prosecution witnesses including injured witness have been examined, therefore, chance of tampering with the evidence/witnesses is remote. Applicant does not bear any criminal record. Looking to the period of custody and the fact that material prosecution witnesses have been examined, his case be considered for bail. Confinement amounts to pretrial detention. He further undertakes not to be source of embarrassment and harassment to the complainant party in any manner and would not move in the vicinity of complainant party and would cooperate in trial. Counsel seeks parity vis-a-vis order dated 11.02.2022 passed in MCRC No.6250/2022 of co-accused namely Jardan Singh. Further applicant voluntarily intends to serve the National/Environmental/Social cause to purge his misdeed if any, in case bail is granted.
3. Counsel for the State opposed the prayer and prayed for dismissal of the bail application.
4. Learned counsel for the complainant also opposed the prayer and submitted that applicant was instrumental in inflicting blow to the deceased and if he is released on bail then stringent conditions be imposed.
5. Heard learned counsel for the parties at length and considered the arguments advanced by them.
6. Considering the submission specially the fact that material prosecution witnesses have been examined, therefore, chance of tampering with the evidence is remote and further looking to the period of custody, this Court intends to allow this application but with be released on bail, on his furnishing personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) with two solvent sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court.
7. This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicant:-
1. The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him;
2. The applicant will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;
3. The applicant will not indulge himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused;
5. The applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial;
6. The applicant will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be;
7. Applicant shall mark his presence on every Monday before the concerned Police Station between 10:30 am to 2 pm till conclusion of trial without any fail and shall register his presence otherwise his bail shall be cancelled.
8. Applicant shall not be a source of harassment and embarrassment to the complainant party in any manner and shall not move in their vicinity and if any harassment and embarrassment is caused by the applicant to the complainant side, then benefit of bail shall be immediately withdrawn and it would be the duty of police officers to look into the complaint of complainant side if any mischief is done by the applicant.
9. It is made clear that this bail is granted once the case is made out for bail and thereafter, direction for plantation of saplings is given and it is not the case where a person intends to serve social cause can be given bail without considering the merits.
8. It is expected from the applicant that he shall submit photographs by downloading the mobile application (NISA
Granting bail based on the reduced chance of tampering with evidence due to the examination of material prosecution witnesses and the period of custody.
The court considered the possibility of course correction and the spirit of community service in granting bail to the applicant.
Granting bail based on the nature of the allegation and the spirit of community service.
The absence of a criminal record and lack of commentary on the merits of the case can be considered in granting bail.
The court may grant bail based on factors such as the status of co-accused and the expected duration of the trial, without commenting on the merits of the case.
The court considered the spirit of community service and the applicant's age in granting bail, subject to strict conditions to ensure compliance and future conduct.
The court may grant bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C based on factors such as lack of criminal history and readiness to abide by specified conditions, without commenting on the merits of the case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.