SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 616

DEEPAK KUMAR AGARWAL
Abhishek Singh Harshana – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anand Purohit, Advocate, Anil Shukla, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

JUDGMENT

Deepak Kumar Agarwal, J. - This is first bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C filed by the applicant for grant of bail.

2. Applicant has been arrested on 09-01-2023 by Police Station Purani Chhawani, District Gwalior in connection with crime No.437 of 2022 for the offence punishable under Sections 447, 465, 468 and 120-B of IPC.

3. As per prosecution case, the allegation against the present applicant is that he fraudulently took electric connection. On the basis of aforesaid, the complaint was registered for the offence punishable under Sections 447, 465, 468 and 120-B of IPC against the present applicant/accused. Earlier, the applicant/accused2023.01.18 was released after giving notice under Section 41-A of Cr.P.C.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the case. Applicant is in custody since 09/01/2023. After investigation, charge-sheet has been filed. Applicant is permanent resident of District Gwalior. Conclusion of trial will take time. On such premises, learned counsel for the applicant prayed for bail.

5. Learned counsel for the State vehemently opposed the bail application and prayed for its dismissal.

6. Bot

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top