IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT GWALIOR
Deepak Kumar Agarwal, J.
Kamlesi Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 2322 of 2023
Decided On : 16-01-2023
Anticipatory Bail - Offence under Sections 498-A, 304-B, 34 of IPC and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act - The court allowed the application for anticipatory bail, directing the release of the applicant on bail upon arrest.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant filed for anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in connection with an offence under Sections 498-A, 304-B, 34 of IPC and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
Finding of the Court:
The court, without commenting on the merits of the case, allowed the application and directed the release of the applicant on bail upon arrest, with specified conditions.
Issues: The main issue was the grant of anticipatory bail to the applicant in connection with the mentioned offences.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the facts and circumstances of the case and allowed the application for anticipatory bail, emphasizing the conditions enumerated in sub-section (2) of Section 438 of Cr.P.C.
Final Decision: The court allowed the application for anticipatory bail and directed the release of the applicant on bail upon arrest, with specified conditions.
JUDGMENT
Deepak Kumar Agarwal, J. - This is first application under section 438 of Cr.P.C. filed by the applicant for grant of anticipatory bail.
2. Th e applicant is apprehending her arrest in connection with Crime No.67/2022 registered at Police Station Amayan, District Bhind (MP) for the offence punishable under Sections 498-A, 304-B, 34 of IPC and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
3. In brief, the prosecution case is that on 16.07.2022 at about 8:10 am one Ravi Chauhan gave an information to PS Amayan District Bhind that on 15.07.2022 in the afternoon while he was on the field, his mother telephoned him that daughter-in-law Smt. Mohini Chauhan wife of Ajay Chauhan committed suicide by hanging herself on the fan. Dead body of the deceased was taken out and placed on floor. On his information, Merg 05/2022 was recorded. Dead body panchnama was prepared and it was sent for post-mortem and as per post-mortem report, the deceased died due to asphyxia as a result of hanging. Merg was enquired. During merg enquiry, the statements of maternal side of the deceased were recorded. They have alleged against the in-laws of the deceased who used to demand two lakh rupees from the deceased and due to non-fulfillment of their demand, they use to treat her with cruelly, as a result of which the deceased committed suicide.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is the mother-in-law of the deceased. She is innocent and falsely implicated in the case. Only omnibus and vague allegations have been levelled against her. Applicant is ready to abide by the conditions as may be imposed by this Court. The applicant is aged around 55 years and there is no possibility of her absconding or tampering with the prosecution case. Charge sheet has already been filed. The father-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law (Devrani) of deceased have already been enlarged on regular bail as well as anticipatory bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court by order dated 23rd of November, 2022 and by order dated 4th of January, 2023 passed in MCRC No.54478 of 2022 and 61280 of 2022 respectively. The applicant undertakes to cooperate in investigation/trial. It is further submitted that On such premises, counsel for the applicant prayed for anticipatory bail.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application and prayed for its rejection.
6. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary. Looking to aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on merits of the case, the application is allowed. It is directed that in the event of arrest, applicant be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rs. twenty Five Thousand) each with one solvent surety each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Arresting Authority/Investigating Officer.
7. The applicant shall abide by the conditions enumerated in sub-section (2) of Section 438 of Cr.P.C.
8. With the aforesaid, the present application stands disposed of.
Certified copy as per rules.
Grant of anticipatory bail based on the facts and circumstances of the case and the conditions specified in Section 438 of Cr.P.C.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. in a case involving serious offences punishable under Sections 304-B, 498-A, 34, 120-B ....
The absence of injury marks in the postmortem report and the lack of commenting upon the merits of the case were crucial in granting anticipatory bail to the applicant.
Grant of anticipatory bail based on the lack of prior complaints regarding cruelty, harassment, and dowry demands before the death of the deceased, and the false and omnibus nature of the allegations....
The court's decision emphasized the importance of the applicant's presence during the trial while allowing the bail application.
Anticipatory bail denied due to serious allegations of involvement in dowry death.
Anticipatory bail can be granted if there are no specific allegations against the applicant, ensuring the right to a fair trial and evidentiary support for accusations.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.