SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, DEVNARAYAN MISHRA
Pushpshree Hospitals And Research Centre Through Proprietor Dr. Girish Taori – Appellant
Versus
Kothari Chemist (Proprietorship Concern), Through Proprietor Jagdishchandra, S/o. Late Shri Manakchand Kothari – Respondent
ORDER :
(Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J.)
This Miscellaneous Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assails the order dated 01.07.2022 (Annexure-P/4) passed in Comms-20/2022 whereby the application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, filed by the petitioners/defendants has been rejected.
2. Briefly stated facts of the case are that the respondents are plaintiffs before the trial Court who have filed a suit for recovery under Order 7 Rule 1 of the CPC read with Section 16 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 2015). On the basis of the transactions and averments, plaintiffs have sought recovery of the amount. After issuance of notice, petitioners/defendants filed an application under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC contending that Section 2 of the Commercial Courts Act defines "Commercial Disputes" and looking to the aforesaid definition, the alleged transaction is not covered under any of the clauses mentioned in Section 2 of the Act and therefore, the provisions of the Act are not applicable and the plaint is liable to be rejected. Another ground that was raised in the application was the non-compliance of Section 12-A of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.