SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 911

RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Manish Jaiswal – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Amit Kumar Chaturvedi for petitioner; Arnav Tiwari, Panel Lawyer for respondents/State

ORDER

1. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition, assailing the order dated 13.3.2019 (Annexure P-2) passed by the respondent No.4/Divisional Forest Officer, Shahdol.

2. Perusal of the order dated 13.3.2019 shows that the pay fixation of the petitioner was found to be erroneous and an amount of Rs.1,42,318/- was directed to be deposited along with an interest by means of challan before 25.3.2019. In the event of failure to do so within the time prescribed, the amount along with interest shall be recovered from the monthly salary of the petitioner.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the pay fixation was done for the period with effect from July 2009 to December 2015. The petitioner had no role to play in the aforesaid fixation and he never misrepresented before the respondent/department nor was any fraud played by the petitioner in any manner in the context of the getting pay fixation from the respondent/department. The petitioner is a Class-III employee working as Forest Guard in the respondent department. Besides the order in question, interest @ 12% per annum from June 2011 has been levied on the alleged recoverable amount, which according to the learned co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top