SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 129

VIVEK AGARWAL
Sher Bahadur Singh Chouhan – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
A. J. Matthews for petitioner; Shiv Kumar Shrivastava, Government Advocate for respondents/State.

ORDER

1. This writ petition is filed claiming relief that notesheet dated 12.11.2003 Annexure P-6 and letter dated 3.3.2004 Annexure P-8 be quashed by a writ in the nature of certiorari and respondents be restrained from reducing pension of the petitioner.

2. Brief facts leading to the present case are that petitioner was appointed as a 'Craft Teacher' vide order dated 10.8.1966 and in pursuance thereof, he had joined at Kawardha on 12.8.1966 vide Annexure P-1. The order of appointment as a 'Craft Teacher' was issued by the office of Divisional Superintendent of Education, Raipur Division, Raipur.

3. The pay scale in which petitioner was appointed as a 'Craft Teacher' was Rs. 150-5-160-6-190 ER-6-220-10-240-ER-12,290/- per month with usual Dearness Allowance as per sanctioned by the State Government from time to time. He was posted at Government Boys Higher Secondary School, Kawardha, District Durg. This order of appointment is available on record as Annexure P-1. Petitioner later on applied for the post of Sales Tax Inspector and on being selected had joined the post in pursuance to the appointment order dated 22nd January, 1974 Annexure P-2 whereby he was appointed as Sales Tax Insp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top