SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 141

PREM NARAYAN SINGH
Chandrakant – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Vivek Singh for appellant; Rajesh Joshi, Government Advocate for respondents/State.

JUDGMENT

1. The appellant has preferred this appeal under section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'the Code') being aggrieved and disgruntled by the judgment dated 31.8.1999 passed by learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, District Ujjain (M.P.) in Sessions Trial No. 96/1998, whereby the learned trial Court has convicted the appellant for the offence under sections 366 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred as to "IPC") and sentenced him to undergo 5 years R.I. and 7 years R.I. with fine of Rs.500/- and Rs.1,000/- and default stipulations.

2. As per prosecution story, on 6.6.1998 at about 4:30, the accused Chandrakant and his mother Geetabai kidnapped the daughter of complainant (Subhash Patidar) whose age of about 16 years from Village Maksi Sarkari Kundi, District Shajapur and when the prosecutrix found, it was revealed that the accused Chandrakant committed rape upon prosecutrix. Initially, the father of prosecutrix, filed an FIR No. 115/1998 against the accused Chandrakant and his mother Geetabai for the offence under sections 363 & 366/34 of IPC and thereafter, when the prosecutrix was found, section 376 of IPC was enhanced. After due

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top