SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 1004

SUBODH ABHYANKAR
PRATAPSINGH ARYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Arpit Singh.
For the Respondent: Harshlata Soni.

ORDER :

1. The petitioners have filed the present revision petition under section 397 read with 401, and 482 of the CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE against of order dated 25-7-2023 passed by the IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Mahidpur, District-Ujjain (M.P.) in S.T. No. 18/2023 whereby charges have been framed against the petitioner for offence punishable under sections 307 of the Penal Code.

2. In brief, the facts of the case are that, on 22-7-2022, at around 2:46 A.M. the F.I.R. under sections 147, 323, 324, 294 and 506 of INDIAN PENAL CODE was registered against the accused persons at the instance of complainant Omsingh Parihar stating that at around 09:00 p.m. on 21-7-2022, the accused persons assaulted him. It is alleged in the FIR that complainant Omsingh Parihar along with his elder brother was going Simrole from his agriculture field, and when he reached near Ram Mandir, at that time, the accused persons Pratapsingh Arya, Ram Singh and Dileep Singh came in front of them from a four wheeler and started abusing the complainant. When the brother of the complainant Amarsingh tried to intervene, at that time, accused Pratapsingh Arya took out a knife from his pocket and started assau

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top