IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
G.S. AHLUWALIA, J.
JAVED NASEEM – Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF M.P. – Respondent
M. Cr. C. No. 8056 of 2024
Decided On : 20-03-2024
Divorce - Muslim Women (Rights on Marriage) Act - Sections 2(c), 3, 4 - The court interpreted the provisions of the 2019 Act, emphasizing that any form of talaq that is instantaneous or irrevocable is void, influencing the decision to uphold the FIR against the applicant.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant sought to quash an FIR alleging illegal divorce practices under the Muslim Women (Rights on Marriage) Act, claiming to have sent a valid Talaq-e-ahsan, while the complainant argued it was invalid due to the nature of the divorce.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the applicant's Talaq-e-ahsan was effectively an instantaneous talaq, violating the 2019 Act, and thus upheld the FIR against the applicant.
Issues: Whether the Talaq-e-ahsan sent by the applicant was valid under the Muslim Women (Rights on Marriage) Act and if the FIR should be quashed.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the applicant's actions constituted an offence under the 2019 Act as the Talaq-e-ahsan was conditional and effectively instantaneous, contrary to the Act's provisions.
Result: The application to quash the FIR is dismissed.
ORDER :
1. This application under section 482, Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking the following reliefs:
2. It is submitted by counsel for the applicant that respondent No. 2 lodged an FIR on the ground that she got married to Javed Naseem on 21-4-2017. On 9-10-2022 and 29-1-2023 her husband Javed Naseem has sent his self-signed Talaknama duly witnessed by Rahim Mirza and Mirza Karim Baig, copy of the said Talaknama was produced along with FIR. It was alleged that divorce has been given on account of non fulfillment of demand of dowry and on account of the fact that she has given birth to a girl child. Even otherwise, on 25-2-2023 her husband and her mother-in-law had come to her parental home along with Raheem Mirza and others and also gave triple Talaq and declared that now they do not have any relationship with the complainant. At that time, her neighbor Mehfooz Rehman was also present in the house. Her husband has also given a copy of Fatwa dated 19-7-2023 by which Mufti Rahees Ahmed Khan has also treated the said divorce as correct whereas Mufti Rahees Ahmed Khan was aware of the fact that Talaq given by her husband is illegal in the light of the provision of Muslim (Women of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019, (hereinafter referred to as ‘the 2019 Act) according to which any pronouncement of Talaq by a Muslim husband upon his wife, by words, either spoken or written or in electronic form or in any manner whatsoever shall be void and illegal and as per section 4 of the 2019 Act such act of her husband and others shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall be liable to fine. Thus, it was alleged that her husband Javed Naseem, her mother-in-law Rukhsana Begum, her sister-in-law Ranu Begum, Rahim Mirza and Mirza Karim Baig, who have signed the Talaqnama as witnesses have prima facie committed an offence. On this complaint the FIR has been registered.
3. Challenging the FIR lodged by the complainant it is submitted by counsel for the applicants that the applicant had sent the Talaq-e-ahsan by registered post on 30-1-2023. It is submitted that the said Talaq-e-ahsan is recognized mode of divorce and the Kerala High Court by judgment passed in the case of Saheer vs. State of Kerala by judgment dated 13-11-2023 passed in Crl. M.C. No. 3632/2023 has held that since Talaq is recognized form of divorce under the Muslim law, therefore, the FIR and consequential proceedings against the petitioner therein is liable to be quashed.
4. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the applicant.
5. Section 2(c) of the 2019 Act defines ‘Talaq’ which means talaq-e-biddat or any other similar form of talaq having the effect of instantaneous or irrevocable divorce pronounced by a Muslim husband. Section 3 provides that “any pronouncement of Talaq by a Muslim husband to his wife, by words, either spoken or written or in electronic form or in any other manner would be void and illegal.” It is submitted by counsel for the applicant that says the Talaq-e-ahsan does not have instantaneous effect and becomes operative only after three Menstural cycle of the wife, therefore, it is not covered under the definition of section 2(c) of the 2019 Act. It is submitted that even after giving Talaq-e-ahsan the husband can always withdraw the same prior to coming into force of the said Talaq.
6. Considered the submissions for the parties.
7. Talaq-e-biddat is also commonly known as Triple Talaq whereas Talaq-e-ahsan can be revoked before it becomes operative. Thus, the only difference between Talaq-e-biddat and Talaq-e-ahsan is that Talaq-e-biddat will come in operation instantaneously
The court established that any talaq pronounced in a manner contrary to the provisions of the Muslim Women (Rights on Marriage) Act is void and illegal.
The court established that any form of Talaq pronounced by a husband under the 2019 Act is void and illegal, reinforcing the protection of women's rights in marriage.
The court concluded that the validity of talaq notices must be determined based on whether they adhered to lawful Islamic principles, affirming the illegality of instant triple talaq under current la....
The court ruled that only Talaq-ul-Biddat is unconstitutional; other forms of talaq, such as Talaq-e-Hasan, remain valid if executed properly, stressing the need for trial court adjudication on factu....
FIR cannot be quashed when charge-sheet has already been filed by prosecution.
FIR cannot be quashed when charge-sheet has already been filed by prosecution.
The court held that the talaq pronounced was not instantaneous and irrevocable, thus not constituting an offence under the Act, as it failed to meet legal requirements.
Talaq by registered post – There cannot be common intention of pronouncement of Talaq – It would be abuse of process of law if matter is asked to be proceeded for offence punishable under Section 4 o....
The court established that the classification of talaq as instantaneous and irrevocable (talaq-e-biddat) is essential for attracting penalties under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.