SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 281

VIVEK AGARWAL
Sarwanlal Yaduwanshi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Utkarsh Agrawal
For the Respondent: Piyush Bhatnagar

ORDER :

Petitioner’s contention is that petitioner is aggrieved of the order of suspension dated 16-2-2024 passed by the Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Chhindwara placing the petitioner under suspension invoking the provisions contained in the Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Service (Discipline and Appeal) Rules 1999.

2. It is submitted that new set of rules have been framed as contained in Annexure P-7 namely Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Service (Gram Panchayat Secretary Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 2011. It is submitted that these rules do not provide for any suspension and, therefore, the action of the authority in passing an order of suspension is per se illegal and liable to be set aside.

3. Shri Piyush Bhatnagar, learned Panel Lawyer placing reliance on the decision of this Court in Lakhpati Yadav vs. State of M.P. and others, W. P. No. 16960/2021 decided on 9-11-2021 wherein this Court has held as under :—

    After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the relevant provisions of the Rules of 2011, it is necessary to make a mention of the fact that Rule 7 of the Rules of 2011 specifically provides that the Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Service (Conduct

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top