SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 350

PRAKASH CHANDRA GUPTA
Mahima – Appellant
Versus
Ved Prakash Patel – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Piyush Jain for petitioner.

ORDER

1. This revision petition u/S 19(4) of the Family Courts Act has been filed by the petitioner/wife being aggrieved by the order dated 22.8.2023 passed by I Additional Principal Judge, Family Court Indore in MJC No.1443/2021, whereby the learned trial Court has partly allowed interim maintenance application filed by the petitioner/wife and awarded her Rs.3,500/- per month from 25.4.2023.

2. It is admitted fact that the petitioner/wife and respondent/husband got married on 22.4.2021 as per Hindu rites and rituals. It is also admitted fact that the respondent/husband is working in Indian Railway as an Assistant Loco Pilot.

3. The petitioner/wife has filed an application for maintenance u/S 125 of Cr.P.C., and has also filed an application for interim maintenance stating that after marriage, she used to live with respondent/husband at her matrimonial house. Thereafter, her husband started to harass her physically and mentally, in furtherance of demand of dowry of Rs.50,00,000/- and a Creta car and for other domestic reasons as well. In furtherance of the aforesaid, the respondent had deserted petitioner/wife. Since 21.6.2021, she has been living at her maternal house. On 13.10.2021,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top