Mahima vs Ved Prakash Patel - 2024 Supreme(MP) 350

Breaking News

Back Next

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(MP) 350

PRAKASH CHANDRA GUPTA
Mahima – Appellant
Versus
Ved Prakash Patel – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Piyush Jain for petitioner.

Headnote: Read headnote

ORDER

1. This revision petition u/S 19(4) of the Family Courts Act has been filed by the petitioner/wife being aggrieved by the order dated 22.8.2023 passed by I Additional Principal Judge, Family Court Indore in MJC No.1443/2021, whereby the learned trial Court has partly allowed interim maintenance application filed by the petitioner/wife and awarded her Rs.3,500/- per month from 25.4.2023.

2. It is admitted fact that the petitioner/wife and respondent/husband got married on 22.4.2021 as per Hindu rites and rituals. It is also admitted fact that the respondent/husband is working in Indian Railway as an Assistant Loco Pilot.

3. The petitioner/wife has filed an application for maintenance u/S 125 of Cr.P.C., and has also filed an application for interim maintenance stating that after marriage, she used to live with respondent/husband at her matrimonial house. Thereafter, her husband started to harass her physically and mentally, in furtherance of demand of dowry of Rs.50,00,000/- and a Creta car and for other domestic reasons as well. In furtherance of the aforesaid, the respondent had deserted pet

Click Here to Read the rest of this document