SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 381

SUNITA YADAV
Ram Kishan Sharma (Dead) – Appellant
Versus
Pankaj Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Santosh Agrawal for LRs of appellant;
Anand Vinod Bhardwaj for respondent No. 1.

JUDGMENT

1. This Second appeal under section 100 of Civil Procedure Code (for brevity, CPC) has been filed by the appellant/plaintiff against the impugned judgment and decree dated 14.10.2016 passed by Court of Tenth Additional District Judge, Gwalior in Civil Appeal No. 13/2015, by which, the Judgment and decree dated 5.11.2015 passed by 3rd Civil Judge, Class – 1, District Gwalior in Civil Suit No. 36-A/2014 has been set aside.

2. The necessary facts for disposal of the present appeal, in short, are that the original plaintiff Ramkishan Sharma (since dead) filed a civil suit seeking eviction against the defendants/respondents on the ground of sections 12(1)(a), (b), (f), (h) of M.P. Accommodation Control Act 1961 in respect to the shop shown as red oblique lines in plaint map situated in the building bearing municipal number 39/593 New number 57/593 surrounded by in the East: Joint House, West: Road Madhavganj, North: House Panchayati (Oswal), South: Shop of Deeptilal.

3. It was the case of plaintiff that father of defendant i.e. Vishandas S/o Khaturam was the tenant in the disputed shop @ Rs. 865/- per month. It is also pleaded that vide rent note dated 15.4.1979 father of plain

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top