SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 397

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, VINAY SARAF
A Minor Through Her Grandmother G – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Ms. Divyakeerti Bohrey for appellant;
Ritwik Parashar, Government Advocate for respondents/State.

ORDER

Sachdeva, Acting CJ. -- 1. Appellant impugns order dated 22.7.2024 whereby the prayer for termination of pregnancy has been declined on the ground that the foetus is over 28 weeks.

2. Subject petition has been filed by the grandmother of the minor girl. It is contended that the parents of the minor girl were separated from the grandmother and were living separately and the child has been brought up by the maternal grandmother from a very early age.

3. In the impugned order, the learned Single Judge has noticed the opinion of the Board part of which has been extracted in the order. For the sake of convenience, the part of the report is extracted herein :--

“5. Opinion by Medical Board for termination of pregnancy :

a) Allowed: -

b) Denied: Denied

The gestational age of the fetus is more than 24 weeks hence medical termination cannot be performed as per MTP act amendment 2021. In case of permission or order of MTP by honorable Court such termination can be performed with all the explained risk of anticipated and unanticipated complications related to termination of such high risk teenage pregnancy and the survivor having mild intellectual disability. Termination of pre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top