SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 406

DUPPALA VENKATA RAMANA
Hemlata Johar (Smt. ) – Appellant
Versus
Salman Khan – Respondent


Advocates:
Ms. Shraddha Dixit for appellants;
Mayank Upadhyay for respondent No. 2/Insurance Company.

JUDGMENT

1. In the instant appeal is preferred by the appellants/petitioners (herein referred to as the petitioners) under section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act (for the “Act”) against the award dated 1.3.2017 passed by 14th Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Indore in Claim Case No.1700649/2015 with a prayer to enhance the awarded amount of compensation.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as they are arrayed before the Tribunal.

3. Heard Ms. Shraddha Dixit, learned counsel for the appellants/claimants and Shri Mayank Upadhayay, learned counsel for the nd respondent/New India Insurance Company Limited. Notice of 1st respondent served no one entered appearance.

4. The accident is not in dispute. The Mahindra Max Vehicle (Jeep) bearing No.M.P.-05-DA-0324 (hereinafter referred to as “the offending vehicle”) being insured with the 2nd respondent and there being no breach of policy conditions, is a finding in Para No.5 (Column No.6) in the Table of the Award, which had attained finality. The 2nd respondent/New India Insurance Company Limited has not challenged its liability. The appellants having not satisfied with the quantum of compensation granted by the Tribuna

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top