Back
G. S. AHLUWALIA
Bhersiya – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. This Criminal Appeal under section 374 of Cr.P.C. has been filed against the judgment and sentence dated 20.1.2001 passed by A.S.J. Kukshi, District Dhar in S.T. No.89/2000, by which, the appellant has been convicted under section 304 part II of I.P.C and has been sentenced to undergo 5 years R.I. and fine of Rs. 1000/- with default imprisonment of 4 months R.I.
2. The prosecution story, in short, is that on 23.12.1999 the complainant Idlibai lodged a report that on 22.12.1999 she, her husband Bhuchariya were in their house. The appellant came there and insisted that her husband should settle his account. At that time she was preparing Chapatis. On the question of money, the appellant started abusing deceased in the name of mother and sister and started pelting stone on her husband Bhuchariya. One stone landed on the upper side of left parietal region of Bhuchariya and another stone landed on the left ear. Bhuchariya raised an alarm, therefore, Tersingh, Phula and Balu came rushing and saw that the appellant was scuffling with deceased Bhuchariya. The appellant thereafter scolded her husband that he should settle down the money dispute, otherwise he would kill her husba
To establish a case under Section 34 of I.P.C. prosecution has to prove prior meeting of minds which may be determined from the conduct of the offenders unfolding itself during the course of action a....
A person may be convicted under culpable homicide when the intent to kill cannot be established, especially when the act occurs without premeditation during a heated altercation.
(1) Right of private defence – Instinct of self-preservation is embedded in DNA of every person – Doctrine of right to private defence is founded on very same instinct of self-preservation that has b....
The nature and gravity of the offences are relevant considerations in determining bail entitlement, and the right of private defence is not available for punishing a wrongdoer.
(1) Right of private defence (Self-defence) – Self-preservation is basic human instinct and is duly recognised by criminal jurisprudence of all civilized countries – In order to justify act of causin....
The right of private defense is negated when the response is disproportionate to any provocation, as established in the court's findings on the nature of the attack.
The court emphasized that the burden of proving the right to private defence need not be established by the defence beyond all reasonable doubt, and rejected the appellants' plea of right to private ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
